The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
Favorable (smooth-water) weather was had on the night of December 23,
1864, and the powder-boat _Louisiana_ was sent in. She was in charge
of Commander A. C. Rhind, who had with him Lieut. S. W. Preston,
Engineer A. T. E. Mullen, Master’s Mate Boyden, and seven men. The
tug _Wilderness_ towed the _Louisiana_ in toward the fort near the
north end of the sea-front until the water was fifteen feet deep, when
the _Louisiana_ cast off the line and proceeded under her own steam
until she was in nine feet of water, when she was anchored. She was
then 300 yards or less from the fort. Butler says she should have been
beached, although he also says (see ante) 400 or 500 yards was near
enough. Captain Rhind says he did not beach her because she would have
been strained on the sand, and was likely to open a seam and let in
the water and spoil the experiment. Clocks had been arranged to drop
weights on explosive mixtures, and these were now set. Then a fire was
built in the shaft tunnel in the stern to make sure that she exploded
if the clocks failed, after which Rhind and his men returned to the
tug. It was then exactly midnight. The tug ran twelve miles out to sea
and stopped to watch the explosion. It took place at 1.40 o’clock, and
amounted to absolutely nothing.
An army engineer found the wreck of a blockade-runner, called the
_Condor_, 800 or 900 yards from the fort, assumed that it was the wreck
of the _Louisiana_, and so reported. This report was used to discredit
Commander Rhind. It seems, on the face of it, to have been a fraud,
for the army officer should have known that nothing would remain of the
_Louisiana_ after such an explosion. But if so much had remained, what
became of Butler’s theory?
The idea that exploding any possible mass of gunpowder in the open
air outside of such a fort could hurt any one or anything inside was
simply childish. But Butler never ceased to argue that it ought to
have been a tremendous success. And it is a most sorrowful fact that,
because of Butler’s political influence, the magnificent bravery of the
powder-boat’s crew was never in any public manner recognized.
The next day, December 24, 1864, the warships steamed in and anchored
at fair range, with the ironclads in one line and the wooden ships some
distance outside. They bombarded the fort from 11.30 A.M. until sunset.
At night Butler, with a part of his transports, came from Beaufort, and
next morning the others arrived. It was arranged to land the troops,
undercover of the gunboats, at a point two miles up the beach from the
fort. Butler’s orders were to make an assault, if that were deemed
feasible, but if not, he was to throw up intrenchments and lay siege to
the fort in the usual fashion. Soundings were made in the morning, a
more effective line of fire was planned, and, late in the forenoon, the
fleet steamed in and once more opened fire. This was on December 25,
1864.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account