The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
Nearly 3,000 troops were landed, with General Weitzel in command. They
captured a couple of little outworks three miles north of the landing
place, and then advanced with skirmishers. One of the skirmishers
captured a flag from one point on the parapet, and another passed
through the sally-port, bayoneted a man on a horse inside, and captured
the horse. Weitzel says (see “Butler’s Book”) that he was within 600
yards of the fort, and from a sand-dune examined the work carefully.
Butler ran down the beach in a shoal-draft transport, and at a range of
500 yards, as he says, looked at the fort for himself. He continues: “I
there met General Weitzel returning from a reconnoissance. He stated to
me that he had been out to the front line, and had seen Fort Fisher.
As a defensive work the fort was uninjured.” He continues: “I said
to Colonel Comstock, who was on board with me [Butler did not land],
‘jump into a boat with General Weitzel, pull ashore and examine with
him and report to me if an assault is feasible; _to me it does not look
so_, but I am unwilling to give it up.’” This is from “Butler’s Book,”
page 794. Being so primed by Butler, Comstock reported an assault not
feasible, and Butler wrote to Admiral Porter that night as follows:
“Upon landing the troops and making a thorough reconnoissance of Fort
Fisher, both General Weitzel and myself are fully of the opinion that
the place could not be carried by assault, as it was left substantially
uninjured as a defensive work by the navy fire. We found seventeen guns
protected by traverses, two only of which were dismounted, bearing up
the beach, and covering a strip of land, the only practicable route,
not more than wide enough for a thousand men in line of battle.... I
shall therefore sail for Hampton Roads as soon as the transport fleet
can be got in order.”
By Confederate reports it appears that the fort was garrisoned by “900
veterans, sixty C. S. N. sailors and marines and 450 junior reserves
between sixteen and eighteen years of age.” On December 24th three
guns had been disabled in the fort, and on the 25th five others were
disabled. Two more had exploded. Including howitzers, the fort had
left thirty-four guns, of which twenty pointed up the beach toward
an assaulting column. There were also some torpedoes planted in the
sand, and a very good line of palisades “made of heavy timber pointed
on top.” But for the delay due to the wild powder-boat scheme, the
Confederates would have been caught with only 667 men in the fort,
according to General Whiting, who commanded the Confederate forces of
the Wilmington district. Whiting wrote that he believed an assault on
Christmas day would have failed. In his official report he said of the
fort: “The delay due to the heavy weather of Wednesday and Thursday
after the arrival of the fleet was its salvation.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account