The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
The first point actually blockaded was Hampton Roads. Flag Officer
G. J. Pendergrast established the blockade there, and issued the
following proclamation on April 30, 1861:
“_To all whom it may concern_:
“I hereby call attention to the Proclamation of his Excellency
Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, under date of
the 27th April, 1861, for an efficient blockade of the ports of
Virginia and North Carolina, and warn all persons interested that I
have a sufficient naval force there for the purpose of carrying out
that Proclamation.
“All vessels passing the Capes of Virginia, coming from a distance
and ignorant of the Proclamation, will be warned off, and those
passing Fortress Monroe will be required to anchor under the guns
of the fort, and subject themselves to an examination.
“United States’ Flagship _Cumberland_, off
“Fortress Monroe, Virginia, April 30, 1861.
(Signed) “G. J. PENDERGRAST,
“_Commanding Home Squadron_.”
This proclamation is worth careful perusal for two reasons: The first
reason is that it contained an untrue statement. Instead of having
“sufficient naval force” “for an efficient blockade of the ports of
Virginia and North Carolina,” he had barely enough for Virginia alone.
Wilmington was a most important harbor of the South; it eventually
became the favorite with blockade-runners, but there was not a ship
ready to close it for many weeks after this proclamation was issued.
More important still is the second reason for reading the proclamation
carefully--the fact that it was issued at the behest of the Navy
Department, and illustrates clearly the department’s idea of a blockade
at that time. It is necessary to say here that, owing to the excitement
of the times, the government was making a very grave error--it was
trying to establish a “paper blockade.” That is to say, there was a
determined effort made to interdict trade where there was no blockade
_de facto_--not a ship, or a rowboat even, stationed to close the port.
And this was a most remarkable undertaking, because the “free trade”
for which the War of 1812 was waged was the freedom to trade in any
belligerent port not actually closed by the presence of a warship.
The government was sacrificing a great principle for the sake of a
temporary advantage.
This was not due to the mistake of a naval officer. It was the
deliberate action of the administration, and it is not unlikely that it
will come back, some time, to plague us when we are the neutral nation
seeking for trade in a belligerent port.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account