The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
Proof of the fact that the whole Cabinet was involved is found in the
correspondence of Mr. Seward relating to the blockade off Charleston.
The _Niagara_ had arrived home from Japan on April 24th, and was sent
to blockade Charleston as soon as possible, arriving off the bar on
May 11th. She remained there four days only, and then went away in
search of a ship that was said to be bringing arms from Belgium to a
port further south, and there was no warship off that harbor until May
28th (some accounts say the 29th), when the _Minnesota_ came to take
the _Niagara’s_ place. The _Harriet Lane_, a revenue cutter, used as
a warship, did lie off the harbor on the 19th, but for thirteen days
Charleston was entirely uncovered.
On May 22, 1861, Lord Lyons, the British minister at Washington, in the
interest of British ships at Charleston, called the attention of Mr.
Seward to the fact that the _Niagara_ had left Charleston on the 15th
and that the harbor was thereby opened. Replying to this, Mr. Seward
wrote, along with other things, the following:
“The blockade of the port of Charleston has been neither abandoned,
relinquished, nor remitted, as the letter of Her Britannic Majesty’s
Consul would lead you to infer. We are informed that the _Niagara_
was replaced by the steamer _Harriet Lane_, but that, owing to some
accident, the latter vessel failed to reach the station as ordered
until a day or two after the _Niagara_ had left.
“I hasten, however, to express the dissent of this Government from the
position which seems to be assumed by your note, that that temporary
absence impairs the blockade and renders necessary a new notice of
its existence. This Government holds that the blockade took effect at
Charleston on the 11th day of this month, and that it will continually
be in effect until notice of its relinquishment shall be given by
Proclamation of the President of the United States.”
On May 13th the British ship _Perthshire_ appeared off Pensacola,
having heard nothing of the blockade there, but she was told that
Mobile was open. So she went to Mobile, loaded cotton, and sailed on
the 30th, although the port was closed on the 26th by the _Powhatan_.
She was captured at sea on June 9th, by the _Massachusetts_, but
released by the flagship _Niagara_, whose captain “considered the
capture illegal, as, by order of the Department, no neutral vessel not
having on board contraband of war was to be detained or captured unless
attempting to leave or enter a blockaded port after the notification
of blockade had been indorsed on her register,” The owner made a claim
for £200 compensation on account of the detention of his ship, which
had lost twelve days of her voyage; and the claim was allowed and paid
by the government of the United States.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account