The history of the damnable life and deserved death of Doctor John Faustus, 1592, together with The second report of Faustus, containing his appearances and the deeds of Wagner, 1594.
History
The history of the damnable life and deserved death of Doctor John Faustus, 1592, together with The second report of Faustus, containing his appearances and the deeds of Wagner, 1594.
Faust, -approximately 1540 -- Legends
“But when in the evening, at table, mention was made of a necromancer
named Faustus, Doctor Martin says earnestly, ‘the devil does not
employ the services of magicians against me; had he been able to do me
hurt, he would have done it long ago. He has no doubt had me often by
the head, but he never-the-less had to let me go again.’”
In a chronicle concluded in the same year by the Count Froben Christoph
von Zimmern, the scene of Faust’s death is given as Staufen in
Breisgau:—
“But that the practice of such art (of soothsaying) is not only
godless, but extremely perilous, that is undeniable, as is proved
by experience, and we know how it went with the famous necromancer
Faustus. He, after many wonderful things which he did during his life,
about which one could write a special treatise, was at last, at an
advanced age, slain by the evil spirit in the province of Staufen in
Breisgau.”
And there is further a reference to his revenge on the inhospitable
monks:—
“About that time (i.e. after 1539), Faustus died at, or at least not
far from Staufen, the little town in Breisgau. During his life, he
was a strange necromancer, who in our times could be found in German
provinces and had so many strange dealings, that he will not easily be
forgotten for many years. He lived to be an old man, and, as is said,
died wretchedly. Many people have thought that he was killed by the
evil spirit, whom in his lifetime he only called his brother-in-law
(_Schwager_). The books which he left behind have come into the
possession of the lord of Staufen, in whose province he died, and
many people have afterwards tried to obtain them, and in my opinion
desired in them a perilous and unlucky treasure. He charmed a spirit
into the monastery of the monks of Lüxheim in Wasgau, which they could
not get rid of for many years, and which troubled them strangely; for
the sole reason that they had once been unwilling to give him shelter
for the night, that was why he had procured for them this turbulent
visitor; at the same time, it is said, that a similar spirit was
attached to the former abbot of St. Diesenberg by an envious wandering
scholar.”
The last considerable reference, before the publication of the
folk-book, is in the edition of _De Praestigiis Daemonum_ by Johannes
Wierus (Johann Weyer, or Wier), which appeared in 1568. A German
edition of this book was published eighteen years later. Wierus was one
of the most distinguished and enlightened physicians of his time, and
he fought for years, at first with some success, against the fanatical
persecution of witches which was providing human torches in every
village in Germany. In this book on the illusions of the devils, he
protests against the witch-burnings, and it is noticeable that he does
not definitely refer to Faust’s alleged compact with the Devil:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account