The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
About this Time the Emperor _Valentinian_ enacted a Law, impowering the
Bishop of _Rome_ to examine and judge other Bishops, that religious and
ecclesiastical Disputes might not be decided by profane or secular
Judges, but by a _Pontiff of the same Religion, and his
Collegues_[1011]. A very imprudent Law, considering the Nature and
Consequences of such a Concession. The Bishops assembled in Council at
_Rome_, in 378. after declaring, in the strongest Terms, their
Approbation of this Law, agreed to present an Address to the Emperor
_Gratian_, wherein they earnestly recommended to him the Execution of
it, because it greatly redounded, say they, to the Honour of the sacred
Ministry; because the Judgment of Bishops was more sure and certain than
that of any Civil Magistrate; and, lastly, because it delivered the
Prelates of the Church from the just Concern they were under, to find
that they could not make their Innocence appear without Racks and
Tortures, which innocent Persons were put to by the Secular
Judges[1012]. This Exemption seems to have been understood by the
Council as extending to all Cases, whether Civil or Ecclesiastical. Be
that as it will, whatever Exemption was by the above-mentioned Law
granted to the Bishops, whatever Power was by that Law vested in the
Bishop of _Rome_, and his Collegues, the Council, with a due Sense of
Gratitude, acknowleged such Power and Immunity to be intirely owing to
the Indulgence of the Emperor: a plain Proof that the absurd and
chimerical Notion of a _Divine Right_ was not yet broached. The Bishops
chose rather to be judged by the Pope and his Collegues, that is, by
their own Brethren, than by Lay Judges, for the Reasons they allege in
their Address to _Gratian_. Hence they chearfully submitted to his
Judgment, and applauded every new Power that was granted him, as
redounding to the Honour of the Episcopal Order. But, alas! they were
not aware, that every new Power, yielded to the Bishop of _Rome_, was a
new Link added to the Chain they were forging, if not for themselves,
for those, at least, who were to succeed them. They little apprehended,
that the Bishop of _Rome_ would, in Process of Time, claim all the Power
vested in him, and his Collegues, as due to him alone, and that too by
_Divine Right_; that, in virtue of such a Claim, he would set up for
universal and sole Monarch of the Church, exercise an unbounded
Authority and Jurisdiction, and degrade all other Bishops from his
Collegues to his Vassals and Slaves. _Blondel_ is of Opinion, that the
Bishop of _Rome_ was, by that Law, only impowered to judge the Bishops
within the Limits of his Jurisdiction, that is, those of the
Suburbicarian Provinces[1013]. Others think that such a Power was only
for a time, and extended to those Bishops alone who were concerned in
the present Schism; which seems most probable, since _Valentinian_
declares, that he enacted the above-mentioned Law to settle the Church,
shaken by the Fury of the Schism[1014].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account