The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
cannot but observe here, that if the parliament have an equitable right
to tax our trade, it is indisputable, that they have as good a one to
tax the lands and every thing else. There is no foundation for the
distinction some make in England, between an internal and external tax
on the colonies.”[76] These expressions could not but spread a general
alarm through the country, and enflame every planter against
parliamentary taxation. The house had so high an opinion of this
pamphlet, that they ordered it to be sent over to Mr. _Mauduit_, with a
letter, wherein they instructed him to use his indeavours to obtain a
repeal of the sugar act, and to exert himself to prevent a stamp act, or
any other imposition and taxes upon this and the other American
provinces. They do not appear to have made any particular objection to
the term _revenue_ introduced into the sugar act; but to have confined
their objections to the laying on of the duty, when they were not
represented.
The act disgusted the more, because of its being so unseasonable. The
duties were to be paid in specie, while the old means of procuring it
were cut off. The ministry, resolved to prevent smuggling, obliged all
sea officers, stationed on the American coasts, to act in the capacity
of the meanest revenue officers, making them submit to the usual
custom-house oaths and regulations for that purpose. This proved a great
grievance to the American merchants and traders. Gentlemen of the navy
were unacquainted with custom-house laws. Many illegal seizures were
made. No redress could be had but from Britain, which it was tedious and
difficult to obtain. Beside, the _American_ trade with the _Spaniards_
by which the British manufactures were vended in return (for gold and
siver in coin or bullion, cochineal, &c. as occasion served) was almost
destroyed instantly, by the armed ships under the new regulations. The
trade was not literally and strictly according to law, but highly
beneficial; and a thorough statesman would have declined employing his
own navy in crushing it. The trade also from the northern colonies with
the _French West-India_ islands was nearly suppressed. These irritating
measures strengthened the opposition to the sugar act.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account