The History of the Ten "Lost" Tribes: Anglo-Israelism Examined — John Shaqi
The History of the Ten "Lost" Tribes: Anglo-Israelism ExaminedBaron, David
History
The History of the Ten "Lost" Tribes: Anglo-Israelism Examined
Baron, David
Anglo-Israelism; Jews -- History; Lost tribes of Israel
[Footnote 16: See 2 Kings xxiii. 29, where the King of Babylon is called
"King of Assyria."]
[Footnote 17: "It is inconceivable," says Dr. Pusey, "that, as the
material prosperity of Palestine returned, even many of the Ten Tribes
should not have returned to their country."]
[Footnote 18: Thus Strabo (quoted by Josephus in "Ant." xiv. 7, 2) could
already say in his day that "these Jews had already gotten into all
cities; and it is hard to find a place in the habitable earth that hath
not admitted this race and is not mastered by it."]
[Footnote 19: "Everywhere we have distinct notices of these wanderers,"
says Dr. Edersheim, "and everywhere they appear as in closest connection
with the Rabbinical hierarchy of Palestine. Thus the Mishnah, in an
extremely curious section, tells how on Sabbaths the Jewesses of Arabia
might wear their long veils, and those of India the kerchiefs round
their head, customary in those countries, without incurring the guilt of
desecrating the holy day by needlessly carrying what, in the eyes of the
law, would be a burden; while in a rubric for the Day of Atonement we
have it noted that the dress which the High Priest wore 'between the
evenings' of the great feast--that is, as afternoon darkened into
evening--was of most costly Indian stuff."]
[Footnote 20: Some have supposed that the 14th verse of Zechariah
xi.--"_And I cut asunder mine other (or 'second') staff, even Bands (or
'Binders'), to destroy the brotherhood between Judah and between
Israel_"--foreshadowed another division between the Ten Tribes and the
Two Tribes subsequent to the partial restoration from Babylon, and after
the coalescence of the people before and in the Exile--as a punishment
for their rejection of their true Shepherd the Messiah, which is
symbolically set forth in that chapter. But this is a mistake. The
אַחֲוָה (_achavah_), "Brotherhood," which was to be destroyed "between
Judah and between Israel," is not to be understood in the sense "that
the unity of the nation would be broken up again in a manner similar to
that in the days of Rehoboam, and that two hostile nations would be
formed out of one people," although the disruption of national unity
which took place in the days of Jeroboam may be referred to _as an
illustration_ of that which would occur again in a more serious form.
"The schism of Jeroboam had a weakening and disintegrating effect on the
nation of the Twelve Tribes, and the dissolution of the brotherhood here
spoken of was to result in still greater evil and ruin; for Israel,
deprived of the Good Shepherd, was to fall into the power of the
'foolish,' or 'evil,' shepherd, who is depicted at the close of the
prophecy."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account