The history of witchcraft and demonologySummers, Montague
History
The history of witchcraft and demonology
Summers, Montague
Demonology; Demonology -- History; Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- History
The first Papal Bull directly launched against the black art and its
professors was that of Alexander IV, 13 December, 1258, addressed to
the Franciscan inquisitors. And it is worth while here to examine
precisely what was the earlier connotation of the terms “inquisitor”
and “inquisition,” so often misunderstood, as our research, though
brief, will throw a flood of light upon the subject of Witchcraft, and,
moreover, incidentally will serve to explain how that those writers who
assign the beginnings of Witchcraft to the Middle Ages, although most
certainly and even demonstrably in error, have at any rate been very
subtilely and easily led wrong, since sorcery in the Middle Ages was
violently unmasked and the whole horrid craft then first authoritatively
exposed in its darkest colours and most abominable manifestations, as
had indeed existed from the first, but had been carefully hidden and
scrupulously concealed.
By the term Inquisition (_inquirere_ = to look into) is now generally
understood a special ecclesiastical institution for combating or
suppressing heresy, and the Inquisitors are the officials attached to
the said institution, more particularly judges who are appointed to
investigate the charges of heresy and to try the persons brought before
them on those charges. During the first twelve centuries the Church was
loath to deal with heretics save by argument and persuasion; obstinate
and avowed heretics were, of course, excluded from her communion, a
defection which in the ages of faith, naturally involved them in many and
great difficulties. S. Augustine,[32] S. John Chrysostom,[33] S. Isidore
of Seville[34] in the seventh century, and a number of other Doctors
and Fathers held that for no cause whatsoever should the Church shed
blood; but, on the other hand, the imperial successors of Constantine
justly considered that they were obliged to have a care for the material
welfare of the Church here on earth, and that heresy is always inevitably
and inextricably entangled with attempts on the social order, always
anarchical, always political. Even the pagan persecutor Diocletian
recognized this fact, which heretics, until they obtain the upper hand,
have throughout the ages consistently denied and endeavoured to disguise.
For in 287, less than two years after his accession, he sent to the
stake the leaders of the Manichees; the majority of their followers were
beheaded, and a few less culpable sent to perpetual forced labour in the
government mines. Again in 296 he orders their extermination (_stirpitus
amputari_) as a sordid, vile, and impure sect. So the Christian Cæsars,
persuaded that the protection of orthodoxy was their sacred duty, began
to issue edicts for the suppression of heretics as being traitors
and anti-social revolutionaries.[35] But the Church protested, and
when Priscillian, Bishop of Avila, being found guilty of heresy and
sorcery,[36] was condemned to death by Maximus at Trier in 384, S. Martin
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account