The history of witchcraft and demonology — John Shaqi
The history of witchcraft and demonologySummers, Montague
History
The history of witchcraft and demonology
Summers, Montague
Demonology; Demonology -- History; Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- History
of Tours addressed the Emperor in such plain terms that it was solemnly
promised the sentence should not be carried into effect. However, the
pledge was broken, and S. Martin’s indignation was such that for a long
while he refused to hold communion with those who had been in any way
responsible for the execution, which S. Ambrose roundly stigmatized as a
heinous crime.[37] Even more crushing were the words of Pope S. Siricius,
before whom Maximus was fain to humble himself in lowliest penitence, and
the supreme pontiff actually excommunicated Bishop Felix of Trier for his
part in the deed.
From time to time heretics were put to death under the civil law to
which they were amenable, as in 556 when a band of Manichees were
executed at Ravenna. Pope Pelagius I, who was consecrated that very
year, when Paulinus of Fossombrone, rejecting his authority, openly
stirred up schism and revolt, merely relegated the recalcitrant bishop
to a monastery. Saint Cæsarius of Arles, who died in 547, speaking[38]
of the punishment to be meted out to those who obstinately persevere
in overt paganism, recommends that they should first be remonstrated
with and reprimanded, that they should if possible be thus persuaded of
their errors; but if they persist certain corporal chastisement is to be
given; and in extreme cases a course of domestic discipline, the cutting
of the hair close as a mark of indignity and confinement within doors
under restraint, may be adopted. There is no hint of anything more than
private measures, no calling in of any ecclesiastical authority, far
less an appeal to any punitive tribunal.
In the days of Charlemagne the aged Elipandus, Archbishop of Toledo,
taught an offshoot of the Nestorian heresy, Adoptionism, a crafty but
deadly error, to which he won the slippery dialectician Felix of Urgel.
Felix, as a Frankish prelate, was summoned to Aix-la-Chapelle. A synod
condemned his doctrine and he recanted, only to retract his words and to
reiterate his blasphemies. He was again condemned, and again he recanted.
But he proved shifty and tricksome to the last. For after his death
Agobar of Lyons found amongst his papers a scroll asserting that of this
heresy he was fully persuaded, in spite of any contradictions to which he
might hypocritically subscribe. Yet Felix only suffered a short detention
at Rome, whilst no measures seem to have been taken against Elipandus,
who died in his errors. It was presumably considered that orthodoxy could
be sufficiently served and vindicated by the zeal of such great names as
Beatus, Abbot of Libana; Etherius, Bishop of Osma; S. Benedict of Aniane;
and the glorious Alcuin.[39]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account