The History Teacher's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, November, 1909 — John Shaqi
The History Teacher's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, November, 1909Various
History
The History Teacher's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, November, 1909
Various
History -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals
First, a few suggestions as to where these sources and secondary
authorities may be found. Of primary importance is Macdonald’s “Select
Charters Illustrative of American History--1606 to 1775;” second,
though not so good, is Preston’s “Documents Illustrative of American
History--1606 to 1863;” third, Hart’s “American History Told by
Contemporaries,” Volume II, Part VI; fourth, the “American History
Leaflets,” Numbers 11, 19, 21, and 33. Beside these the teacher may
easily discover one or another of the documents in many other places.
Of the secondary authorities, beside the ordinary histories of the
American nation, all of which contain the leading facts and incidents
upon which the Declaration is based, the teacher is referred especially
to Friedenwald’s “Declaration of Independence.” Next to that, the
most important works are Moses Coit Tyler’s “Literary History of the
American Revolution,” and Frothingham’s “Rise of the Republic of the
United States,” particularly the foot-notes. Furthermore, the teacher
and the student will find illuminating essays on the political theories
of the Declaration of Independence in Merriam’s “American Political
Theories,” in A. Lawrence Lowell’s “Essays in Government,” in Leslie
Stephen’s “English Thought in the Eighteenth Century,” and in Bryce’s
“Studies in History and Jurisprudence.” By no means all of these works
need be consulted; an examination of one or two of them will suffice.
The study of the Declaration falls naturally into three parts and
students may therefore profitably be set to work separately or in
groups on one of its three problems. First, there is the problem of
the growth of the idea of independence; second, there is the problem
of the validity and cogency of the numberless adverse criticisms of
the Declaration. Is it merely a mass of “glittering and sounding
generalities of natural right?” as Choate called it. Is it a partisan
and unfair statement? Is its political theory false and therefore of no
historical importance? Third, there is the possibility of submitting
the Declaration itself to complete and thorough class-room analysis.
Idea of Independence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account