In the spring term the process is repeated with each student, certain modifications being introduced, however, which constitute steps in advance and prevent the men from viewing the second piece of work as a monotonous repetition of the first. For instance, the subject is chosen from the modern period; while the notes and essay are done in the same manner, a longer time is allowed, and, on the basis of a sharp criticism of his first theme, much improvement in these respects is expected; and the character of the bibliography is entirely changed. The primary object of the first bibliography, it will be noticed, was to teach the student how to find _all_ the books on his subject, how to use the library, catalogues, bibliographies, etc. In the case of the second, we endeavor to teach him how to find the _best books_; in other words, we require a selected and critical bibliography, and insist that no book be entered unless its card bears a statement of its comparative value by some recognized authority. To secure such statements the student must, of course, in addition to using the usual bibliographies critically and selectively, search for book reviews in the various reputable magazines, historical and otherwise. As an additional incentive, a prize, named for the Hon. Andrew D. White, is awarded to the author of the best piece of work. This system was evolved from tentative experiments lasting three years, and has now been in operation, in its present form, for three more; and it seems to be the opinion of competent judges that it is an unqualified success. In the first place, it teaches the student a great deal, not only about particular phases of European history, but more especially about methods of work which will stand him in good stead in all his future courses; and while it demands much of him, the requirements are all so carefully graded and the work so progressive in character that at no time is he overwhelmed by the amount suddenly thrust upon him. And another feature that deserves emphasis is the care taken to prevent each man from slighting any part of the process; during the time he is at work on his two themes he must meet his instructor in no less than five personal consultations which punctuate at carefully chosen times the various stages of the work. The obvious difficulty that the system demands too much of the instructor is met by the fact that the History Department, as well as the whole Faculty, have shown their appreciation of the results obtained by lightening the ordinary work of teaching to an extent that permits the teacher to carry this extra burden without undue effort. THE WRITINGS OF WILLIAM PENN.