Epic poetry itself gives us no direct information about the shape of the
chiton in the Homeric period. Helbig maintains, basing his assertions on
some casual indications, and chiefly on the oldest monuments, that it
differed from the dress of the classic period in being close-fitting and
free from folds. It is true that the old vase paintings show us the
short chiton fitting closely round the body and drawn quite firmly round
the legs. It is girt fast round the hips, and as a rule does not go
below the knee. However, it is not safe to draw conclusions of this kind
from ancient pictures, for much which might be regarded as
characteristic of ancient costume may be due only to the incompleteness
of art, which was not yet capable of representing full garments with
folds. Thus, in ancient works of art, the long chiton also appears quite
narrow in the upper part, but then falls perpendicularly from the waist,
sometimes gradually, but more often straight without any folds to the
feet. (Compare the figure of Apollo in Fig. 1 and of Priam in Fig. 2.)
Both the long and short chitons as a rule have no sleeves, but only an
armhole; we sometimes find short sleeves not quite covering the upper
arm. Unfortunately, we cannot form a clear notion from the pictures of
the mode in which it was put on. It is, however, probable that the
[Illustration:
_Luk de Binleail_ _A Roy. sc_
FIG. 1.]
short chiton was sewn together all round and thrown over the head, where
there may have been an additional slit connected with this opening, and
fastened with a pin. There are, however, no traces of this on the
monuments, nor are fibulae or brooches mentioned in the Homeric
descriptions in connection with the male chiton. Probably the long
chiton was cut in the manner of a chemise. Helbig’s hypothesis that
there was a slit down the middle of the front is just as uncertain as
his similar assumption with regard to Homeric female dress.
[Illustration: FIG. 2.]
Besides the chiton, the older male costume also had a sort of loincloth
or apron. It is not at all improbable that at one period the Greeks wore
merely the apron and cloak, and no chiton. When the latter became
universally fashionable (which, according to recent surmises, was due to
Semitic influence) the cloth disappeared, or continued only as part of
military dress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account