How long this ancient dress continued in use we cannot determine with
any certainty; but the majority even of vase pictures with black figures
show a different dress. It is true, as we mentioned just now, that the
long chiton still continued in use besides the short one, but the cut
and the mode of wearing it changed.
The monuments of this period almost always show signs of drapery, and
this is, moreover, of an artificial, exaggerated, and pedantic kind. It
must have been the fashion at that time, that is, from the sixth till
nearly the middle of the fifth century, to lay the folds of men’s dress,
as well as of women’s, in symmetrically parallel lines. In pictures the
lower edges of dresses and cloaks show various regularly cut-out points,
while on the inner side there are many small zigzag folds arranged with
laborious symmetry. (Compare Fig. 4, “The Rape of Helen,” after a vase
picture by the vase painter Hiero.) This may be partly due to the
artistic style, which at that period inclined to over-elaboration; yet
it is impossible to doubt that we find here not only an expression of
archaic art, but also the representation of a dress laboriously and
artificially folded, stiffened, and ironed, in which the folds were
produced by external aids, such as ironing, starching, pressing, even
stitching of the stuff laid in folds, or sewing such folds on to the
material. We cannot determine when this custom began in Greece. In works
of art we find it comparatively late in the sixth century B.C.; yet, as
Helbig remarks, it is by no means impossible that this fashion existed
at a far more ancient period, since the custom of laying material in
artificial folds by means of stiffening or ironing was already known in
Egypt in 4000 B.C.; and it therefore seems extremely probable that the
Phoenicians adopted the practice at a very early period, and introduced
it into Greece. It is a very natural assumption that this mode of
draping would in the first instance be adopted for linen material, and
that it would therefore be introduced among the Greeks with the linen
chiton, which took the place of the woollen one formerly worn.
[Illustration: FIG. 4.]
On the other hand, however, it is probable that, as woollen clothing was
afterwards worn as well as linen, they attempted to ornament this in
similar fashion by artificial folds; the works of art, however, show
that these folds were far less in quantity and less sharply defined in
woollen clothing than in linen, which is naturally much better adapted
for the purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account