Of course, marriage customs differed considerably in the various Greek
states, as is proved by many allusions. Strangest of all seems the
Laconian custom, which points clearly to marriage by capture; a custom
of great antiquity, mentioned in many legends (as, for instance, that of
the Dioscuri and the daughters of Leucippus). No mention is made here of
a real marriage celebration; the bridegroom carried off his bride, who
must, however, have previously been betrothed to him by her father, from
her parents’ house, and in his own dwelling handed her over to the
charge of some middle-aged woman (νυμφευτρíα), who was either a relation
or an intimate friend. During his absence at the common dining table, to
which all Spartan citizens and youths went every day, this woman cut off
the bride’s hair, dressed her in male dress, with men’s shoes, and left
her lying in the dark on some straw. Then, when the bridegroom
returned, he unloosed the bride’s girdle and carried her in his arms to
the bridal chamber. Curiously enough, the appearance of secrecy was kept
up for some time longer; the young husband continued to live with the
other young citizens, and only visited his wife occasionally in secret.
Similar practices prevailed also at Crete. We do not, however, know how
long these strange customs continued in the Doric states.
In considering the position of women in relation to men and in the
household, we must allow for the differences between the heroic and
historic periods, and also between the Doric and the Ionic-Attic states.
Of the Aeolian states we know very little. In the heroic period, as far
as we can gather from the Homeric poems, women occupied an important
position, in many respects equal to that of the men. Heroic times, like
the rest of Greek antiquity, were only acquainted with monogamy;
polygamy is an entirely Oriental custom. Still, it was by no means
unusual in olden times for princes and nobles to have a number of
concubines, who were either slaves or female captives, besides their own
lawful wives, who were sprung of noble family. In fact, the idea of
conjugal fidelity held good only for the female portion of the
population, while the men were absolutely free to act as they pleased.
Undoubtedly there were cases in which husband and wife were so well
suited together that the men resisted all temptations to infidelity;
among these we may include Hector, Laertes, and Odysseus, in spite of
the amours of this last with Circe and Calypso. Whenever we obtain a
closer insight into the conditions of married life, as in the case of
Hector and Andromache, Odysseus and Penelope, the impression received is
a favourable one. There is even a vein of true affection perceptible,
which is generally absent from ancient conceptions of marriage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account