The Honey-Bee: Its Natural History, Physiology and ManagementBevan, Edward
History
The Honey-Bee: Its Natural History, Physiology and Management
Bevan, Edward
Bee culture; Bees
The success of the investigation induced this accomplished young
lady to extend her dissection to the common workers, which was crowned
with a result equally gratifying. Parallel instances have been observed
with regard to the humble-bee, the wasp and the ant, amongst which, those
that have usually been called neuters are found to be females, and when
fertile, they, like the fertile workers in a bee-hive, produce males
universally.
Having now traced these insects through their regular stages of egg,
larva, nymph, until they become perfect bees, and having noticed the
facts which show the working bees to be females, I shall advert to
the more intricate and mysterious business of _Impregnation_. This is
a subject which was long involved in obscurity, and which indeed is
still clouded by some uncertainty. Schirach and Bonner stoutly denied
the necessity of sexual intercourse between the queen and the drones,
considering the former as a mother and yet a virgin, and Swammerdam was
of the same opinion; he ascribes impregnation to a vivifying seminal
aura, which is exhaled from the drones and penetrates the body of the
queen. This opinion arose from his observing a very strong odour to
be exhaled, at certain times, from the drones; "Hanc sententiam ratam
habuit, quia organa apum propagini servientia, sexus utriusque, ritè
dissecta, inter se ita disparia videbantur, ut congressus ne fieri quidem
ullo pacto posset." His opinion with respect to the vivifying influence
of the seminal aura also accounted satisfactorily, to his own mind, for
there being such a prodigious number of drones, as, in proportion to
their number, would of course be the intensity of their peculiar odour.
Reaumur very successfully combated this fanciful doctrine, and Huber
has confuted it by direct experiment. Reaumur inclined to the opinion
that there was a sexual intercourse, though his experiments left that
question undecided. Arthur Dobbs, Esq. has given it as his opinion that
the queen's eggs were impregnated by coition with the drones, and that a
renewal of the intercourse was unnecessary. He however thought that she
had intercourse with several, instead of with one only, in order that
there might be a sufficient deposition of sperm to impregnate all her
eggs. About the beginning of the last century, Maraldi broached another
hypothesis; he imagined that the eggs were fecundated by the drones,
after the queen had deposited them in the cells, similarly to what
takes place in the fecundation of fish-spawn. In 1777 that ingenious
naturalist Mr. Debraw, who was apothecary to Addenbroke's Hospital at
Cambridge, also adopted this opinion; and even so late as the year 1817
Huish has supported the same doctrine, and I believe does so at the
present time. Debraw thought he had discovered the prolific fluid of the
drones, in the brood-cells, which fertilizing the eggs caused them to
produce larvæ. Huber repeated the experiments of Debraw, and at first
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account