The Honey-Bee: Its Natural History, Physiology and ManagementBevan, Edward
History
The Honey-Bee: Its Natural History, Physiology and Management
Bevan, Edward
Bee culture; Bees
gave him credit for the reality of the discovery; but further and more
minute observation convinced him that it was illusory, and that what he,
as well as Debraw had taken for seminal fluid, was nothing more than
light reflected from the bottoms of the cells, when illuminated by the
sun's rays. Moreover, it did not escape the acute mind of Huber, that
eggs were laid and larvæ hatched, when there were no drones in existence,
viz. between the months of September and April. The two hypotheses
just mentioned, accounted satisfactorily, to their supporters, for the
prodigious disproportion in the number of the sexes. But Huber made
the experiment of confining the queen and rigidly excluding every male
from a hive; nay more, he carefully examined every comb, and satisfied
himself that there was neither male nymph nor worm present; and lest it
should be supposed that the fertilizing fluid might be imported from
other hives, he totally confined the bees, on two occasions, and still
the eggs were prolific; which proves clearly that their fertility must
have depended upon the previous impregnation of the queen. The analogy
of wasps is indeed admitted, by Huish, to discountenance the opinion
which he entertains in common with Maraldi and Debraw. The queen wasp
alone, survives the winter, and deposits her first eggs in the ensuing
spring in combs of her own construction. Here then impregnation must
have taken place in the preceding autumn, whilst the eggs were in the
ovaria. It was the opinion of Hattorf, Schirach, and probably also of
Bonner, that the queen-bee impregnated herself; but this opinion is too
extravagant to require serious refutation: it arose probably, from their
making experiments upon queens taken indiscriminately from the hives,
and which had previously been impregnated. This no doubt misled Debraw,
who, without knowing it, had chosen for experiment some queens that had
had commerce with the males. The experiments of Huber were made upon
virgin-queens, with whose history he was acquainted from the moment of
their leaving their cells. In the course of his experiments he found
that the queens were never impregnated, so long as they remained in the
interior of the hive; but that _impregnation always takes place in the
open air_, at a time when the heat has induced the drones to issue
from the hive; on which occasions, the queen soars high in the air,
love being the motive for the only distant journey she ever takes. "The
rencontre and copulation of the queen with the drone take place exterior
to the hive," says Lombard, "and whilst they are on the wing." They are
similarly constituted with the whole family of flies. A corresponding
circumstance may also be noted with respect to the queen-ant; and Bonnet,
in his _Contemplations de la Nature_, has observed that _she_ is always
impregnated whilst she is on the wing. The dragon-flies copulate as they
fly through the air, in which state they have the appearance of a double
animal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account