In 1885, when he was twenty-six years old, Francis decided to leave
home. After a week in Manchester he requested and received from his
father the price of a railway ticket for London. The trip to the vast
and strange city must have been made with only the vaguest of plans for
the future. The despairing youth seemed to have no other purpose than
to rid his father of his vexatious presence. There were friends in
London, on one of whom Francis was directed to call for a weekly
allowance from home. But a temperamental reluctance kept the young man
away from those who could help him, and even the weekly allowance after
a while came to be unclaimed. The rough, cyclonic forces of the huge
city caught this helpless child of a man's years in the full swing of
their blind sweep and played sad tricks with him. In a period
extending over nearly three years Francis Thompson led the life of a
vagrant in the streets and alleys. He made one or two brave essays at
regular work of the most commonplace character, but without success.
The worn copies of Aeschylus and Blake in the pockets of this ragged
and gaunt roustabout contained no useful hints for the difficulties of
the peculiar situation; its harshness could be transmuted into
temporary and blessed oblivion by a drug whenever the means for
purchase could be acquired. The Guildhall Library was much frequented
until shabbiness was excluded by the policeman. This outcast poet,
approaching thirty years of age, was at various times a bootblack, a
newsboy, a vendor of matches, a nocturnal denizen of wharves and
lounger on the benches of city-parks. His cough-racked frame was the
exposed target of cold and rain and winds. He became used to hunger.
At one time a six-pence, for holding a horse, was his only earnings for
a week. It was while he was aimlessly roaming the streets one night
almost delirious from starvation that a prosperous shoe-merchant,
benevolently engaged in religious rescue-work, came across Thompson,
and, struck by the incongruity of his gentle speech, induced him to
accept employment in his shop. But one cannot allow business to suffer
on account of an inveterate blunderer, even though the blunderer wear
wings and has endeared himself to the family. Mr. McMaster, kindly
Anglican lay-missionary, who deserves grateful remembrance for
recognizing and temporarily helping merit under the most deceptive
disguise, was obliged much against his inclination to dismiss Francis
and to allow him to fall back into the pit of squalor and vagabondage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account