The House of the Lord: A Study of Holy Sanctuaries Ancient and ModernTalmage, James E. (James Edward)
Religion
The House of the Lord: A Study of Holy Sanctuaries Ancient and Modern
Talmage, James E. (James Edward)
Latter Day Saint temples; Temples
No detailed description of the Tabernacle, its appurtenances or
furniture, will be attempted at this place; it is sufficient for our
present purpose to know that the camp of Israel had such a sanctuary;
that it was constructed according to revealed plan; that it was the
embodiment of the best the people could give both as to material and
workmanship; that it was the offering of the people to their God, and
was duly accepted by Him.[5] As shall yet be shown, the Tabernacle
was a prototype of the more stable and magnificent Temple by which in
course of time it was superseded.
After Israel had become established in the land of promise, when,
after four decades of wandering in the wilderness, the covenant people
possessed at last a Canaan of their own, the Tabernacle with its sacred
contents was given a resting place in Shiloh; and thither came the
tribes to learn the will and word of God.[6] Afterward it was removed
to Gibeon[7] and yet later to the City of David, or Zion.[8]
{6} David, the second king of Israel, desired and planned to build a
house unto the Lord, declaring that it was unfit that he, the king,
should dwell in a palace of cedar, while the sanctuary of God was but
a tent.[9] But the Lord spake by the mouth of Nathan the prophet,
declining the proposed offering, and making plain the fact that to be
acceptable unto Him it was not enough that the gift be appropriate,
but that the giver must also be worthy. David, king of Israel, though
in many respects a man after God's own heart, had sinned; and his sin
had not yet found atonement. Thus spake the king: "I had in mine heart
to build an house of rest for the ark of the covenant of the Lord, and
for the footstool of our God, and had made ready for the building: But
God said unto me, Thou shalt not build an house for my name, because
thou hast been a man of war, and hast shed blood."[10] Nevertheless,
David was permitted to gather material for the House of the Lord, which
edifice not he, but Solomon, his son, should build.
Soon after Solomon's accession to the throne he set about the labor,
which, as heritage and honor, had come to him with his crown. He laid
the foundation in the fourth year of his reign, and the building
was completed within seven years and a half. With the great wealth
accumulated by his kingly father and specifically reserved for the
building of the Temple, Solomon was able to put the known world under
tribute, and to enlist the co-operation of nations in his great
undertaking. The temple workmen numbered scores of thousands, and every
department was in charge of master craftsmen. To serve on the {7} great
structure in any capacity was an honor; and labor acquired a dignity
never before recognized. Masonry became a profession, and the graded
orders therein established have endured until this day. The erection
of the Temple of Solomon was an epoch-making event, not alone in the
history of Israel, but in that of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account