The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, considered — John Shaqi
The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, consideredPhilodemus
Religion
The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, considered
quicquid per leges liceat_;—the power of doing whatever may be permitted
by the laws, points out, only, that peculiar portion of liberty allowed
by each respective Government, to its appropriate subjects, but can never
be substituted for the general term itself.—In the Eastern regions, where
the Prince is despotic, where the will of the Sovereign is the law of
the state, the liberty of the subject will be bounded by the Will of a
Tyrant; under such circumstances the people are mere slaves;—hence, the
Right Honorable Gentleman’s definition is equally applicable to Slavery,
as to Liberty,—it may, however, be looked upon as the definition of
a lawyer, and as lawyers, in general, accommodate their pleadings to
the taste and interest of their clients, it may be presumed, that the
Right Honorable Gentleman adopted his definition to the interest, and
peculiar taste of his employer:—in the course of his harangue on the same
occasion, the Right Honorable Gentleman is reported to assert, (if we
understand the report aright,) that the great body of the people has no
right to enter into discussions concerning civil polity, or the immediate
measures of Government, an assertion that does but little credit to his
head, or his heart.—It may incline the people, however, to examine into
the Right Honorable Gentleman’s own claim to this important privilege;—it
may also be asked, who are interested in the measures adopted by
administration?—Is it the public at large? or is it the ministry? The
ministers are, indeed, a part of the people, but a failure in vigilance,
with respect to their own immediate interests, will never be attributed
to them; the security, the property, the liberty of the people, are at
stake, and it behoves them to be equally attentive to their concerns:—to
whom are ministers responsible?—to the representatives of the Nation:—who
are the constituents of this representative body?—the people:—in order
then to estimate the merits of a candidate, the people should become
competent judges of the excellence of their own Constitution, and of
the qualifications necessary, in a representative, to watch over and to
maintain its inviolability;—a close inspection therefore, into the System
of Government, and into the conduct pursued by their own representatives,
is a duty they owe themselves,—their fellow-subjects, and their
posterity;—the upright senator will also invite this serenity, whereas
the corrupt fool of a crafty minister will endeavour to evade enquiry, as
in the event of detection, he contemplates his own disgrace.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account