The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, consideredPhilodemus
Religion
The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, considered
to such tender consciences as the Baronet possesses, they are matters
of belief, and therefore left to every man’s own determination;—since,
however, some particles of his questions have been absolutely and with
truth denied, whilst others have been so far answered, we hope, as to
exculpate the Catholics from all criminality either in act or intention,
we may conclude, that should a Cardinal’s hat be now engaged to the Revd.
Baronet, he will perhaps, not only be almost, but altogether inclined to
renounce his own faith, and turn Papist.
In treating of the monstrous doctrines ascribed by Sir Harcourt Lees to
the Catholics, we may premise that their own general conduct sufficiently
refutes his accusation:—his strong assertions however, may seem to
demand some farther enquiry.
The 4th Lateran council was held in the year 1215, at which were present,
most of the christian sovereigns;—this council therefore may be properly
termed a general congress of the temporal, as well as spiritual Powers
of Christendom; they assembled for the purpose of suppressing the heresy
of the Manchæans, or Albigenses, whose doctrines were (according to
Mosheim) not only subversive of morality, decency, and good order, but
even destructive to the human species,—it was supported by the Counts
of Thoulouse, Cominges, Foix, and aided by numerous bodies of banditti,
hired for this purpose.—The heresy was condemned by the spiritual
authority of the church; and the Fiefs of the princes encouraging it,
were declared forfeitures to their liege lords, by the authority of the
sovereigns, there assembled:—the censures of this council or rather
congress were never promulgated, and scarcely known in this island, but
were directed (we believe, solely) against the Manchæans or Albigenses,
and the princes above mentioned, who encouraged and protected the
votaries of this pernicious heresy.
The council of Constance, held in the year 1414, expressly declares
that it is heretical to affirm it lawful for a subject to kill his
prince, on any pretence whatsoever, session 15. One solitary instance
of the contrary doctrine being maintained, occurs in Mariana, whose book
was condemned, and publicly burnt by a provincial council of her own
order; this Mariana was a Spaniard, born at Talavera, in the year 1537,
who became a Religious in the year 1554;—he was also condemned by the
parliament of Paris, and by the doctors of Sorbonne, and his book burnt
by the hands of the common hangman.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account