The Influence of Buddhism on Primitive ChristianityLillie, Arthur
Religion
The Influence of Buddhism on Primitive Christianity
Lillie, Arthur
Buddhism; Christianity and other religions -- Buddhism
_Buddha._
I propose now to give a short life of Buddha, noting its points of
contact with that of Jesus.
PRE-EXISTENCE IN HEAVEN.
The early Buddhists, following the example of the Vedic Brahmins,
divided space into Nirvritti, the dark portion of the heavens, and
Pravritti, the starry systems. Over this last, the luminous portion,
Buddha figures as ruler when the legendary life opens. The Christian
Gnostics took over this idea and gave to Christ a similar function.
Buthos was Nirvritti ruled by "The Father" (in Buddhism by Swayambhu,
the self-existent), Pravritti was the Pleroma. "It was the Father's
good pleasure that in him the whole Pleroma should have its home."
(Col. i. 19.)
"BEHOLD A VIRGIN SHALL CONCEIVE."
Exactly 550 years before Christ there dwelt in North Oude, at a city
called Kapilavastu, the modern Nagar Khas, a king called Suddhodana.
This monarch was informed by angels that a mighty teacher of men would
be born miraculously in the womb of his wife. "By the consent of the
king," says the "Lalita Vistara," "the queen was permitted to lead
the life of a virgin for thirty-two months." Joseph is made, a little
awkwardly, to give a similar privilege to his wife. (Matt. i. 25.)
Some writers have called in question the statement that Buddha was born
of a virgin, but in the southern scriptures, as given by Mr. Turnour,
it is announced that a womb in which a Buddha elect has reposed, is
like the sanctuary of a temple. On that account, that her womb may be
sacred, the mother of a Buddha always dies in seven days. The name of
the queen was borrowed from Brahminism. She was Mâyâ Devî, the Queen of
Heaven. And one of the titles of this lady is Kanyâ, the Virgin of the
Zodiac.
Queen Mâyâ was chosen for her mighty privilege because the Buddhist
scriptures announce that the mother of a Buddha must be of royal line.
Long genealogies, very like those of the New Testament, are given also
to prove the blue blood of King Suddhodana, who, like Joseph, had
nothing to do with the paternity of the child. "King Mahasammata had a
son named Roja, whose son was Vararoja, whose son was Kalyâna, whose
son was Varakalyâna," and so on, and so on. (Dîpawanso, _see_ "Journ.
As. Soc.," Bengal, vol. vii., p. 925.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account