The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
Fúnez carried instructions to appoint twenty familiars and no more in
Las Palmas, and such as were found necessary in the other cities and
islands. This was his first care, and he soon had a formidable body,
recruited from the old nobility, to support his authority. Thus far the
Inquisition had had no special habitation, not even a prison, and those
under trial on the most serious charges were confined in their own
houses or in the public gaol, where there was no provision for their
segregation. Fúnez demanded a competent building, with the necessary
conveniences, a demand not easily complied with in so small a place, and
he finally was installed in the episcopal palace, then vacant through
the absence of the bishop.[279] This of course could be but temporary
and some other provision must have been made, for we are told that, when
the Dutch under Pieter Vandervoez, in 1599, took possession of Las
Palmas, they burnt both the episcopal palace and the building of the
Inquisition. The former was not rebuilt until thirty years later by
Bishop Murga and the latter, as we shall see, was reconstructed in due
time on a large scale by the tribunal.[280]
A matter not easily understood is the bestowal, May 25, 1568, on Fúnez,
by the dean and chapter, _sede vacante_, of cognizance of superstitions
and sorcery, because these crimes should not remain unpunished and his
powers as inquisitor were deficient in this respect.[281] These offences
in Spain were recognized as subject to inquisitorial jurisdiction when
savoring, as they always were assumed to do, of heresy and pact with the
demon; they formed by far the larger part of the cases coming before the
Canary tribunal and the previous inquisitors had not hesitated to deal
with them. They formed however a kind of debatable ground, claimed by
both the secular and spiritual as well as the inquisitorial jurisdiction
and Fúnez may have taken advantage of the impression produced by his
reception to obtain from the chapter, in the absence of a bishop, a
transfer of its powers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account