The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
Undeterred by the fate of Bishop Vera, his successor Fernando de
Figueroa, about 1590, had a lively struggle with the tribunal. He
excommunicated Doctor Alonso Pacheco, regidor of the Grand Canary and
deputy governor of Tenerife, because he would not abandon illicit
relations with a married woman. The tribunal intervened and evoked the
case, giving rise to a prolonged competencia, which remained undecided
in consequence of the death of the culprit.[356] Causes of such strife
were never lacking and the first half of the seventeenth century was
largely occupied by them and by an endless struggle to compel the
chapter to allow to the inquisitors cushioned chairs in the
cathedral.[357] On one occasion, in 1619, the chapter offended the
tribunal by obeying a royal cédula and disregarding a threat which
enjoined disobedience. The canons were thereupon excommunicated and
appealed to the king, who found himself obliged to withdraw the
cédula.[358] The overbearing conduct of the tribunal produced a chronic
feeling of exasperation and the veriest trifle was sufficient to cause
an outbreak. One custom provocative of much bad blood was that of
selecting in Lent a fishing-boat and ordering it to bring its catch to
the Inquisition, when, after supplying the officials and prisoners, if
there was anything left it might be sold to the people. In 1629 the
municipality fruitlessly complained of this to the visitor Juan de
Escobar, and in 1631 there was an explosion. The Audiencia rudely
intervened by throwing in prison Bartolomé Alonso, the luckless master
of a boat selected, and threatening to scourge him through the streets.
He managed to convey word to the tribunal, which at once sent its
secretary Aguilera to the Audiencia, with a message asking the release
of Alonso, but the Audiencia refused to receive anything but a written
communication and Aguilera came back with a mandate requiring obedience
under pain of two hundred ducats, but he was received with insults and
Alonso was publicly sentenced to a hundred lashes. Then the tribunal
declared the judges excommunicate, displayed their names as such in the
churches and had the bells rung. The Audiencia disregarded the censures
and arrested Aguilera, while the Alcaide Salazar, who had accompanied
him, hid himself, but the Audiencia ordered a female slave of his to be
seized and his house to be torn down, in response to which the tribunal
published heavier censures and fines, demanding the release of the
prisoners. Then Bishop Murga intervened and asked the tribunal to accept
an honorable compromise, but it refused; he returned to the charge,
urging the affliction of the people, who dreaded an interdict at a time
when there was so much need of rain and when Holy Week was approaching;
if reference were made to the Suprema there would be a delay of six
months and meanwhile the prisoners under trial by the Audiencia would
languish in gaol, for the judges would be incapacitated by the
excommunication.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account