The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
The eighteenth century offers a similarly eventless record. So great was
the inertness that the Edict of Faith, which was the chief source of
denunciations and which should be published yearly in all parish
churches, became virtually obsolete. From the time of Commissioner
Paternina, who published it in 1669, forty-nine years elapsed before it
was again published, in 1718, by Commissioner Juan de Arechederra; and
Fray Juan de la Concepcion, writing in 1790, tells us that it had never
been published since then.[566] It was a somewhat remarkable and
uncalled-for burst of energy on the part of Commissioner Bernardo de
Ustáriz, in 1752, when a score of Moro sailors of an English ship
performed some pagan rites with songs and incense and he applied to the
archbishop and then to the governor for aid to punish the scandal. Both
declined, when he got General Antonio Romero, who was a familiar, to
undertake an investigation. Then force was needed to arrest the culprits
and a prison to confine them, and Romero sought the Marquis of Ovando,
the governor for this, but Ovando replied that the matter was under his
exclusive jurisdiction, an assertion which he repeated to Ustáriz,
adding that he intended to punish the guilty. Ustáriz complained of this
to the tribunal, which declared, February 19, 1754, that the governor
had failed in his duty; that his assertion of cognizance of such cases
should be expunged from any instrument in which it appeared, and that
the commissioner and notary should notify him of this in person. The
Suprema, however, took a cooler view of the matter, pointing out that,
by the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713, English subjects could not be
prosecuted for practising their religion in Spanish territory, but at
the same time it approved of the action of the tribunal and promised to
ask the king to make due provision for the future.[567] Seeing that
baptism was necessary to give jurisdiction to the Inquisition and that
natives, even when converted, were not subject to it, this sudden access
of zeal on the part of Ustáriz would appear somewhat supererogatory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account