The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
If the natives were exempt from inquisitorial jurisdiction, they were
subject to that of the missionary fathers and it may be questioned
whether in this they were to be envied. About 1756 an obstinate revolt
in the Island of Bonol throws some light on the relations between the
converts and their spiritual guides. A district belonging to the
Jesuits was placed under the control of Padre Morales who, observing
that one of his subjects did not attend mass or frequent the sacraments,
ordered him to be arrested. The man was known to be a desperate
character and it was not until Morales laid explicit commands on the
alguazil mayor of the village that the attempt was made, which resulted
in the killing of the alguazil and the flight of the culprit. Francisco
Dagohoy, brother of the slain, brought the corpse to Morales for
Christian burial, which the padre refused, unless the regular fees were
paid, intimating moreover that the alguazil had died under
excommunication as a duellist. Naturally exasperated, Dagohoy, who was a
leader among his people, assembled them, set forth their wrongs
eloquently and had little difficulty in persuading them to follow him to
the mountains, to the number of some three thousand. Entrenching
themselves, they kept up a predatory warfare, in which Morales was
killed and also an Augustinian Fray Lamberti. The rigor with which the
taxes were exacted by the Spaniards drove many to join them and the
rebellion was still flourishing in 1792, in spite of repeated overtures
and offers of pardon--indeed, it may be doubted whether it was ever
completely pacified under Spanish domination.[570]
* * * * *
While this Philippine branch of the Inquisition accomplished so little
for the faith, it was eminently successful in the function of
contributing to the disorder and confusion which so disastrously
affected Spanish colonial administration. As everywhere else, the
immunity of the officials was a fruitful source of trouble. In 1601,
Benito de Mendiola, a familiar, was prosecuted in the secular court for
the murder of Roque Espina de Cáceres, secretary of the governor, but
the commissioner interposed and a long competencia followed, at the end
of which, after a delay of ten years, the papers in the case were
ordered to be surrendered to him by a decree of the Suprema of November
28, 1611. In consideration of the distance and delay, Mendiola was
liberated on bail; the widow of his victim desisted from the prosecution
and finally, after further postponement caused by the difficulties of
communication, the Mexican tribunal sentenced him to four months’
banishment, two months’ suspension from his office as notary and a fine
of fifty pesos--a punishment sufficient to show his guilt and his escape
from justice.[571]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account