The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
The vessel by which Salcedo was shipped did not reach Acapulco until
January 7, 1671, being the first that had come for two years. It brought
the earliest direct intelligence of the events at Manila and the report
of Paternina, but the news had already arrived there by way of Batavia,
Holland and Madrid. In Madrid it had naturally aroused the Council of
Indies which presented to the queen-regent a consulta embracing three
propositions: I. If the commissioner made the arrest without orders from
the tribunal, he should be severely punished for exposing the colony to
risks so great. II. If the arrest was by order of the tribunal, it
should have notified the Viceroy of Mexico in order that he might make
provision for simultaneously filling the vacancy. III. That precise
instructions for the future should be given for the arrest of persons of
that rank, in conformity with the royal cédulas and concordias providing
for such cases. To this the Suprema, still completely in the dark as to
the circumstances of the case, replied somewhat superciliously that, if
the commissioner had exceeded his duty, he would be punished
appropriately; that the arrest was not ordered by the tribunal but, if
it had been, no notice was due to the viceroy in matters of faith; the
cédula of April 2, 1664, provided for the government of the Philippines
in cases of vacancy, which is all that human foresight can anticipate.
No new instructions were necessary, as such cases were already provided
for in the existing regulations; sentences on persons of the rank of Don
Diego Salcedo were not executed without consulting the Suprema, except
when irremediable injury might be anticipated from delay, and it was an
accepted rule that, in important cases of faith, all such personages
were subjected to the Inquisition. To this the Council of Indies
rejoined by insisting that it should not be left to the discretion of a
commissioner to determine whether the danger of delay justified
arresting a governor and imperilling the safety of the colony; the
tribunal should give notice to the viceroy, without violating the
secrecy of the Inquisition, and it concluded by asking that definite
instructions be given to the inquisitor-general and Suprema that in
matters of such importance such action should be taken as would avoid
the danger of a recurrence of similar proceedings. Even the Council of
Indies did not venture to hint that the governor of an important colony,
if suspected of heresy, could not be suddenly arrested, and it only
objected to this being done without preliminary precautions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account