The Interdependence of LiteratureCurtis, Georgina Pell
General
The Interdependence of Literature
Curtis, Georgina Pell
Comparative literature
been passed down from one age to another.
The Renard of Goethe, and the Zaire of Voltaire were taken from the old
fabliaux. In the fourteenth century the coming of the Popes and the
Roman Court to Avignon introduced an Italian element, and the language
of Tuscany took the place of the Provencal among the upper classes.
La Fontaine, called the "Prince of Fablists," appeared in the
seventeenth century. Many of his fables were borrowed from ancient
sources; but clothed in a new dress. He has been closely imitated by
his Confreres and by the fablists of other nations; but has easily
remained the most renowned of them all.
The philosophy of Descartes in the sixteenth century prepared the way
for Locke, Newton and Leibnitz; and his system, although now little
used, was really the foundation of what followed. He is said to have
given new and fresher impulse to mathematical and philosophical study
than any other student, either ancient or modern.
Pascal, a contemporary of Descartes, is renowned for his Provencal
Letters, a book that has become a classic in France. It is full of wit,
and of exquisite beauty of language; but its teaching is pure
sophistry. Pascal first set the example of writing about religion in a
tone of mock levity, especially when by so doing, he could abuse the
Jesuits. In the end this weapon of keen and delicate satire was turned
against Christianity itself, when Voltaire in the eighteenth century
recognized its possibilities, and made use of it.
The older French literature in the sixteenth century had become so
neglected, and was so lacking in cultivation; so little adapted to
poetry, that the nation seemed in danger of losing all its earlier
traditions. For a hundred years France was given over to profane and
light literature. Montaigne, Charyon, Ronsard and de Balzac are some
of the names of this period. The death of a cat or dog was made the
subject of a poem that was no real poetry. It is due to the women of
France--to Madame de Rambouillet and her confreres, and to the literary
coteries that arose in the middle of the seventeenth century--that
French literature acquired a deeper and more serious tone. This period
was followed by the founding of the French Academy, of which Cardinal
Richelieu was the chief patron. The tragic dramatists, Corneille and
Racine, now appeared on the literary horizon. Racine's language and
versification was said to be far superior to either Milton in English
or Virgil in Latin.
In tragedy the French stand pre-eminent; but it is matter for regret
that their subjects are never taken from their own nation--they rarely
represent French heroes; and it is a weakness of their literature that
they make no direct appeal to the national feeling. There is a close
connection between the classical dramas of Racine and Corneille, and
such works as Pope's Iliad, Addison's Cato and Dryden's Alexander's
Feast, showing the general interest in Greek and Roman subjects during
their time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account