The island of anarchy: A fragment of history in the 20th century — John Shaqi
The island of anarchy: A fragment of history in the 20th centuryWaterhouse, Elizabeth
Science
The island of anarchy: A fragment of history in the 20th century
Waterhouse, Elizabeth
Science fiction; Twentieth century -- Forecasts -- Fiction
There were not wanting intelligent persons to whom the punishment of
death for a misused life seemed a terrible and even a wicked thing. Yet,
not only had such punishment been in use for just such offences in the
time of Queen Elizabeth and of other sovereigns, but at so late a time
as the commencement of the present century, war among civilized nations
was considered justifiable, and the profession of a soldier was even
held to be a noble and Christian calling. The very women whose tender
hearts cried out against the new law would send their young sons away
with their blessing to face death in compassing that of other innocent
and unwilling victims in a cause for which, often, none of them cared.
Those who thus perished in war, believing that it was for their
country’s honour that they fought, were among the best and bravest of
the nation—men to whom discipline and order were their very breath.
Those whom the new law excluded from life were scarcely worthy of the
name of men, and more hostile to their country than any of the soldiers
of other states.
This then was the course adopted with reference to the Law-Breakers. We
must now speak of the Law-Deniers. Anarchy, Socialism, free-land
leagues, communistic democracy more or less indigenous, and every shade
of Nihilism and Dynamitism introduced from the East and the West, had so
long had free course that a large mass of the population had come to
believe practically that might was right, and the problems of the
earliest stages of barbarism were staring men in the face as the
products of an over-ripe civilization.
It was true, and the young rulers recognized this, that much of the
discontent of the poorer classes had had just ground in the indifference
and selfish luxury of the rich, but that cause was already in great part
removed, and in two ways.
Women as highly educated as men, and now wise enough to see that they
were made for better things than the dust of politics, turned their
thoughts to home reforms. Their higher standard of principle and
refinement of taste led to a contempt for what was gorgeous or costly in
dress or equipage, food or furniture, as essentially vulgar, or at best
barbaric. Thus their quiet ways and simple attire left little space to
be bridged over as regards outward show between them and the thrifty
women of a humbler class, and that space was bridged by kindly
intercourse, by knowledge shared, and by the ready sympathy which is the
gift of the highest intelligence.
This was one great power for good. The other was the fact that so many
owners of land had devoted large portions of it to sites for Industrial
Villages, and even those who had no sympathy for the poor or enthusiasm
for the good of their country, partly for fashion’s sake, and partly
because these schemes proved not only useful to the poor but beneficial
to the landowner, joined to aid the great work of withdrawing the
population from the towns into the country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account