The ivory king : $b A popular history of the elephant and its alliesHolder, Charles Frederick
History
The ivory king : $b A popular history of the elephant and its allies
Holder, Charles Frederick
Elephants
In Africa, according to Drummond, the wild elephants migrate south
in time for certain fruits, which shows that they must remember the
pleasures of the past season. The migration is not suggested by a lack
of food, as the supply of mimosa and other trees does not give out. When
a wild elephant takes a branch in its trunk, and uses it to brush away
flies, it shows more intelligence than it is generally given credit
for; while its lodging dust and sand on its back to prevent the attack
of these pests, is also to be considered an intelligent act. Elephants
are extremely cautious, and this has been used as an argument against
their intelligence. Sanderson says that the animal is stupid because
the simplest fence is often sufficient to protect grain from them; but
I am inclined to think that this is owing to their extreme caution: the
fence may have in their mind some association with the pitfall, or traps
of some kind, which have been met in their experience. An elephant will
rarely step upon a bridge that is not safe, and many instances could be
cited showing that their protests and objections were founded upon an
intelligent appreciation of danger. Sanderson says also that the elephant
lacks originality: but the two instances I have mentioned,—namely,
using a branch to brush off flies, and sharpening the stick,—will, I
think, in the opinion of my young readers, free the great animal from
this imputation; and I do not recall many actions performed by _wild_
animals, that show more appreciation of the practical application of
cause and effect. The intelligence of the elephant has been a subject of
varied appreciation. Many observers have considered remarkable actions
of elephants involuntary, when in truth they were merely obeying the
commands of their riders or mahouts, who expressed their wishes by the
pressure of their legs, or by the voice, which was not seen or heard by
the observer. When Tavernier was travelling with the Mahommedan army of
the Mogul, he was astonished to see the elephants seize the little images
which stood before the pagodas, and dash them to the ground. The Hindoos
readily believed that the elephant did this from a religious aversion
to the idols, but the traveller knew that the mahouts were secretly
directing the great animals. So, in passing in review before the king,
the elephants did not salute until coming to his majesty.
[Illustration: PLATE III.
THE SIBERIAN MAMMOTH.
(_By courtesy of Ward & Howell, Rochester, N. Y._)
_Page 39._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account