The Jew, The Gypsy and El IslamBurton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islamic
The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam
Burton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islam; Jews; Romanies
Firstly, the convenient appearance of the Ayát, or inspired Versets.
But what would have been their use had they not descended when wanted
to solve a difficulty or convey a precept? Do we doubt the Books
of Moses because Revelation is conducted upon precisely the same
principle? And who will deny that enthusiasm would have produced them
more effectually than fraud? It is a general rule that to deceive
others well we must first deceive ourselves. He that would be believed
in by others must thoroughly believe in himself. Is it likely that such
men as Abubekr and Umar would become the victims of a mere fraud, so
palpable to every petty annalist and compiler in this our modern day?
Neither they nor Muhammad even at his dying hour seem to have doubted
his inspiration. The Prophet’s last words were, “Prayer! Prayer!” And,
according to the Shiahs, a few minutes before breathing his last he
called for an inkholder and a pen to write the name of his successor.
Is this the death-bed scene of a hypocrite or an impostor?
Secondly, the delivery of the inspiration by the Archangel Gabriel,
and the frequent visions of heaven and heavenly beings recorded by
the Muslim Prophet. Without having recourse to any other explanation,
are not instances of the kind perpetually recorded in the history of
mankind? And granting that such apparitions are purely subjective,
shall we charge with fraud all those subject to them? How often has
the Founder of Christianity appeared to the highly imaginative races
of Southern Europe? How frequently have fervent Muslims been favoured
with “a call” by Muhammad and Ali? Physicians and men of science have
accounted for these seemingly marvellous apparitions by natural causes.
Why then, unless by the action of mere prejudice, should we determine
the same thing to be imposture in one man and yet regard it with
reverence in another? Who also has even ventured to decide what the
_modus inspirandi_ or the divine afflatus really is? The most ancient
theory apparently is that angels ([Greek: αγγελοι: angeloi]) were used
as messengers between God and man; and thus the Muslims, whose tenets
are identical in this point with the Jews, rank angelic below human
nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account