The Jew, The Gypsy and El IslamBurton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islamic
The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam
Burton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islam; Jews; Romanies
Thirdly, the change from peaceful to warlike language, from the arts of
eloquence and persuasion to the propagandism of fire and steel. But did
not the Founder of Christianity declare, “I came not to send peace, but
a sword” (Matt, x. 34)? And did Moses disdain to place carnal weapons
in the hands of his people? The great Lawgiver of Israel sanctioned
the murder in cold blood of women and childish captives. Even kings
were hewed in pieces before the Lord. These atrocities were strictly
forbidden by Muhammad. Even forcible proselytism was not allowed. The
_protégé_ of El Islam paid a small capitation tax, and was allowed to
practise his faith and to worship his God as his law directed. Had,
moreover, the Prophet forged the fresh order to propagate his scheme
by the sword, surely he was not so shallow an impostor as to leave
behind him those peaceful revelations which might so easily have been
cast into the fire. No; the man honestly believed, like Moses, that the
voice of Allah spoke within him.
The fourth error is that Muhammad, unable to abolish certain
superstitious rites and customs of the ancient and Pagan Arabs,
incorporated them into his scheme, and thus propitiated many that
before avoided him. We have seen that the same might be objected to
Moses. But Muhammad may surely have believed in the defilement of
Allah’s holy places by Pagans, and have restored them to their pure
original purposes. Thus the Kaabah, that Pantheon of the idolater, was
given to El Islam as the house built by Abraham and Ishmael. And what
antiquary so wise as to declare that the Friend of God did not visit
Mecca and there lay the foundations of a mosque and an abode?[219] The
gigantic tombs of Adam and Eve at Mecca and Jeddah were in the olden
times places of litholatry. Yet might not the numerous Arab Christians,
in whose religion Muhammad believed before the old dispensation was
abrogated by a new scheme, have had traditions concerning the meeting
of our first parents on the Mount of Arafat, and their sepulture in
the Holy Land? Mecca was at that time consecrated by no less than five
religions. The Guebre had established there the Shrine of Saturn. The
Hindu had made it the residence of the third person of his triad. The
Pagan Arabs had erected there a gigantic Pantheon. The Jews revered it
because, as Ibn Shaybat relates, Moses and Aaron performed pilgrimages
there; when the famous Tobba Judaized, he invested the house with a
splendid curtain. And, finally, the Christians, according to some
authors, had procured admission into the Kaabah for the images of the
Virgin and Child. Colonists and expatriated men readily connect the
remarkable events and incidents of their religion and history with
the strange objects revered in foreign lands. The Muslims in Sindh, as
an instance, have occupied in force most of the sacred places of the
Hindus; often, too, both Monotheist and Polytheist worship at the same
shrine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account