How might an emotionally sensitive or mentally trained man pour forth
supplication before a guzzling braggart like the Aristophanic Heracles
or an effeminate voluptuary like the Apollo of Alexandrian poetry? It
seems hard to discover any other defense than the one Charles Lamb
offered for the dramatists of the Restoration—that the world the gods
moved in was a wholly different one from the human world; a world in
which moral categories had no existence, a Land of Cockayne without
vices, because it was without the sanctions which vice disregards. No
doubt some Greeks felt in this way toward the myths. But it was not a
satisfactory theory. It introduced a dualism into standards of conduct
that soon became intolerable, when men reflected seriously upon other
sides of the divine nature, and drew inferences from it.
As a matter of fact, the difficulty we find in addressing words of
prayer and praise to such unworthy gods as sat upon the Homeric Olympus
is modern, and was probably not felt at all by the vast majority of
Greeks, either in Homer’s time or later. Not that the fraud, cruelty,
faithlessness there exhibited seemed to the Greeks of any epoch
commendable or imitable qualities. Even the Homeric Greek was far from
being in a barbarous or semi-barbarous state. Civic virtues as between
men were known and practised. But the personality of the individual gods
in these stories could be disregarded in practice, because they were in
no sense a part of the Greek religion. The chastest of men might with a
clear conscience worship the lecherous Zeus, because worship did not at
all concern itself with the catalogue of his amours. In Homer’s time and
after, the Greek firmly believed that the Olympians were actually
existing beings, but he scarcely stopped to ask himself whether it was
literally true that Zeus had bidden Hera be silent under threats of
personal violence. What did concern him in his relation with his gods
was the disposition in which the god was likely to be toward him or his
people. And his religious activity was directed to the end of making
that disposition as good as possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account