The personality of the Greek gods was not so sharply individualized as
the myths we happen to know would indicate, but the gods were persons.
That is, during the act of prayer and sacrifice there was conjured up in
the mind of the worshiper a definite anthropomorphic figure, who dealt
with him somewhat as a flesh and blood man would do. But what was
present in a Roman’s mind in very early times—those of the kingdom and
the early republic—was probably not at all like this. The name of his
deity was often an abstraction, and even when this was not verbally the
case, the idea was an abstract one. And this abstraction had so little
plastic form that he was scarcely certain of the being’s sex to which he
addressed words of very real supplication, and wholly uncertain what, if
any, concrete manifestation the god might make of his presence.[37]
But it will be well to understand that this abstraction, which the Roman
knew as Salus, or Fortuna, or Victoria, was not a philosophic
achievement. It was not a Platonic “idea.” No one could doubt the fact
that in times of danger safety was often attained. The means of
attainment seemed frequently due to chance; that is, to the working of
unintelligible forces. It was to evoke these forces and set them in
operation that the Roman ritual was addressed, and whether these forces
acted of their own mere motion, or whether the formularies contained
potent spells, which compelled their activity, was not really of moment.
That was the nature of the “abstraction” which such words as Fides,
Concordia, and the rest signified to Roman minds.
In the early days a great deal of the religious practice was borrowed
from the Etruscan neighbors, conquerors and subjects of Rome. The
Etruscans, as far as anything can be said definitely about them, were
especial adepts in all the arts by which the aid of deities, however
conceived, could be secured. How much of actual religious teaching they
gave the Romans, that is, how far they actually influenced and trained
the emotions which the sense of being surrounded by powerful and
unaccountable forces must excite, is not yet determinable. But they gave
the Romans, or increased among them, the belief in the efficacy of
formulas, whether of the spoken word or of action.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account