The virtual autonomy of the Persian period allowed the development of a
well-organized ruling caste of priests, in which were perhaps included
the Soferim, or Scribes, men learned in the Law, who had no definite
priestly functions. The scope of the high priest’s jurisdiction, the
extent of his powers, may not have been sharply defined as yet. In
itself the presence of a high priest as head of the state was not at all
unusual in that region. As has been said, the interference of the
representative of the Persian sovereign was a variable quantity. In the
second half of the fifth century a Jew, Nehemiah, held the office of
tirshatha, or viceroy, an accident that was of inestimable value to the
growing community, and may have finally secured the threatened political
existence of Jerusalem.
One other political event, of which we have dim and confused accounts,
was a rebellion—whether in or of Judea—under Artaxerxes Ochus (359-338
B.C.E.). The account of Josephus speaks of feuds in the high-priestly
family, the murder of a claimant in the temple precincts, and the
intervention of the all-powerful eunuch Bagoas.[63] That some such thing
happened there can be no reasonable doubt, although we cannot recover
the details. It is, however, unwarranted to make the incident in any way
typical of the fortunes of Judea during Persian rule. There was no
tradition in later times of Persian oppression, nor can even this
rebellion, if rebellion it was, have involved serious repressive
measures, since the Greek invasion a few years later found the Jews
loyal to their overlord.
When the Macedonian Alexander changed the face of the East, the Jews
were swept along with the rest of the loose-jointed empire built by
Cyrus and Darius. Upon Alexander’s death, after uncertainties which the
whole Levant shared, Palestine fell to Egypt, of which it was a natural
geographical appanage as it had been for millennia before. Under the
suzerainty of the Ptolemies the Jewish communities in Egypt received
very considerable reinforcements, and the home-country became a real
national expression, and rapidly attained a relatively high degree of
material well-being, since the practical autonomy of Persian days was
continued. Seized by Antiochus of Asia in the decrepitude of Egypt,
Judea entered with full national consciousness into the heterogeneous
kingdom ruled by a singularly fantastic royal house. A blunder in policy
of the peculiarly fantastic Epiphanes provoked a revolt that was
immediately successful in causing the prompt abandonment of the policy,
and was helped by dynastic chaos to a still larger measure of success.
[Illustration: RUINS OF THE AMPHITHEATER AT GERASA (JERASH) GILEAD,
PALESTINE
(c. _Underwood and Underwood_)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account