The leaders of that revolt, the Hasmonai family, produced a succession
of able soldiers. Besides the old Mattathiah and his heroic son Judah,
Jonathan, Simon, and John, by selling their service dearly to this one
or that one of the Syrian pretenders, by understandings with the
ubiquitous Roman emissaries, above all by military skill of the first
order, changed the virtual autonomy of Persian and Ptolemaic times into
a real one, in which Syrian suzerainty was a tradition, active enough
under the vigorous Sidetes, non-existent under the imbecile
Cyzicenus.[64]
During all this time Jews, from personal choice and royal policy, had
extended their dispersion throughout the new cities founded by their
Seleucid masters. Until the battle of Magnesia, 190 B.C.E., Asia Minor
was the real center of the Seleucid monarchy; and in the innumerable
cities established there, Jews in large numbers settled. When Judea
became independent there were probably as many Jews outside of it as
within it.
With the Hasmonean princes—“high priest” is the title which the Hebrew
legend on their coins gives them[65]—the country entered upon a career
of conquest. Galilee, Idumaea, the coast cities of Philistia, portions
of Gilead were seized by John, or Aristobulus, or Alexander, so that
Judea rapidly became one of the important kingdoms of the East, with
which no one could fail to reckon who became active in the affairs of
that region. Rome had backed the Hasmoneans against Syria so long as
Syria presented the possibility of becoming dangerous. But that soon
ceased. By a strange paradox of history the Hellenized East found its
last champion against the Romans in the Persian kings of Pontus, and
when Mithradates was crushed, it could only be a question of the order
in which every fragment of Alexander’s empire would slip into the maw of
the eagles. The Roman liquidator, Pompey, appeared in Asia, and Antioch
became a suburb of Rome.
The pretext for clearing their way to Egypt by taking Judea presented
itself in a disputed succession. The sons of Alexander Jannai were
compelled to accept the arbitrament of the Romans, with the usual
result. The loser in the award, Aristobulus, attempted to make good by
arms what he had lost in the decision. A Roman army promptly invested
Jerusalem, moved by the patent injustice of allowing a capable and
vigorous prince to usurp the place of a submissive weakling. The Roman
general walked into the inner court of the temple, and peered into the
Holy of Holies. He found nothing for his pains, but his act symbolized
the presence of the master, and left a fine harvest of hate and distrust
for the next generations to reap.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account