Just as the Jewish religion was in a highly developed form at the time
of the Exile, so the Law was very fully developed. That the entire Law,
as embodied in the Pentateuch, was promulgated by Moses is not
altogether likely, but that any considerable fraction of it is later
than 586 B.C.E. is equally unlikely. Interpolations doubtless occurred
often. To insert into an authoritative text an inference from the words
which the interpolator honestly believed to be true, was not a generally
reprehended practice. Perhaps some of the emphasis upon sacerdotal
organization which parts of the Pentateuch show, may have so been
imported into the constituent codes of the Torah. But on how slight a
scale this was can be readily seen by comparing the Pentateuch with any
of the apocryphal books consciously designed to magnify the
priesthood.[66] The actual civil law bears every mark of high antiquity.
The religious law is at least not inconsistent with such antiquity.
Now neither in civil law nor in religious thought did the community that
slowly formed itself about the acropolis of Zion remain stationary. We
must suppose that the energies of the returning exiles were pretty well
concentrated upon the economic problems before them. But an actual
community they were from the start, and although the communal life was
far from attaining at once to the richness of former days, it contained
all the elements necessary. Without a common law, _i.e._ a regulation of
conflicting claims to property, and without a common cult, _i.e._ a
regulation of the communication between the divine and the human members
of a state, no state was conceivable to the ancient world. Changed
conditions will infallibly modify both, and some of these modifications
it will be necessary to understand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account