The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
Gen^l Pinkney said it was the true interest of the S. States to have no
regulation of commerce; but considering the loss brought on the commerce
of the Eastern States by the revolution, their liberal conduct towards
the views[46] of South Carolina, and the interest the weak South^n
States had in being united with the strong Eastern States, he thought it
proper that no fetters should be imposed on the power of making
commercial regulations, and that his constituents though prejudiced
against the Eastern States, would be reconciled to this liberality. He
had himself, he said, prejudices ag^{st} the Eastern States before he
came here, but would acknowledge that he had found them as liberal and
candid as any men whatever.
[46] He meant the permission to import slaves. An understanding
on the two subjects of _navigation_ and _slavery_, had taken
place between those parts of the Union, which explains the
vote on the motion depending, as well as the language of
Gen^l Pinkney & others.--Madison's Note.
M^r Clymer. The diversity of commercial interests of necessity creates
difficulties, which ought not to be increased by unnecessary
restrictions. The Northern & middle States will be ruined, if not
enabled to defend themselves against foreign regulations.
M^r Sherman, alluding to M^r Pinkney's enumeration of particular
interests, as requiring a security ag^{st} abuse of the power; observed
that the diversity was of itself a security, adding that to require more
than a majority to decide a question was always embarrassing as had been
experienced in cases requiring the votes of nine States in Congress.
M^r Pinkney replied that his enumeration meant the five minute
interests. It still left the two great divisions of Northern & Southern
interests.
M^r Gov^r Morris, opposed the object of the motion as highly injurious.
Preferences to american ships will multiply them, till they can carry
the Southern produce cheaper than it is now carried.--A navy was
essential to security, particularly of the S. States, and can only be
had by a navigation act encouraging american bottoms & seamen. In those
points of view then alone, it is the interest of the S. States that
navigation acts should be facilitated. Shipping he said was the worst &
most precarious kind of property, and stood in need of public patronage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account