The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Madison went into a pretty full view of the subject. He observed
that the disadvantage to the S. States from a navigation act, lay
chiefly in a temporary rise of freight, attended however with an
increase of South^n as well as Northern Shipping--with the emigration of
Northern Seamen & merchants to the Southern States--& with a removal of
the existing & injurious retaliations among the States on each other.
The power of foreign nations to obstruct our retaliating measures on
them by a corrupt influence would also be less if a majority sh^d be
made competent than if 2/3 of each House sh^d be required to legislative
acts in this case. An abuse of the power would be qualified with all
these good effects. But he thought an abuse was rendered improbable by
the provision of 2 branches--by the independence of the Senate, by the
negative of the Executive, by the interest of Connecticut & N. Jersey
which were agricultural, not commercial States; by the interior interest
which was also agricultural in the most commercial States, by the
accession of Western States which w^d be altogether agricultural. He
added that the Southern States would derive an essential advantage in
the general security afforded by the increase of our maritime strength.
He stated the vulnerable situation of them all, and of Virginia in
particular. The increase of the coasting trade, and of seamen, would
also be favorable to the S. States, by increasing, the consumption of
their produce. If the wealth of the Eastern should in a still greater
proportion be augmented, that wealth w^d contribute the more to the
public wants, and be otherwise a national benefit.
M^r Rutlidge was ag^{st} the motion of his colleague. It did not follow
from a grant of the power to regulate trade, that it would be abused. At
the worst a navigation act could bear hard a little while only on the S.
States. As we are laying the foundation for a great empire, we ought to
take a permanent view of the subject and not look at the present moment
only. He reminded the House of the necessity of securing the West India
trade to this country. That was the great object, and a navigation act
was necessary for obtaining it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account