The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
Mr. Gov^r Morris. If qualifications are proper, he w^d prefer them in
the electors rather than the elected. As to debtors of the U. S. they
are but few. As to persons having unsettled accounts he believed them to
be pretty many. He thought however that such a discrimination would be
both odious & useless, and in many instances, unjust & cruel. The delay
of settlem^t had been more the fault of the Public than of the
individuals. What will be done with those patriotic Citizens who have
lent money, or services or property to their Country, without having
been yet able to obtain a liquidation of their claims? Are they to be
excluded?
M^r Ghorum was for leaving to the Legislature the providing ag^{st} such
abuses as had been mentioned.
Col. Mason mentioned the parliamentary qualifications adopted in the
Reign of Queen Anne, which he said had met with universal approbation.
M^r Madison had witnessed the zeal of men having acc^{ts} with the
public, to get into the Legislatures for sinister purposes. He thought
however that if any precaution were taken for excluding them, the one
proposed by Col. Mason ought to be new modelled. It might be well to
limit the exclusion to persons who had rec^d money from the public, and
had not accounted for it.
M^r Gov^r Morris. It was a precept of great antiquity as well as of high
authority that we should not be righteous overmuch. He thought we ought
to be equally on our guard ag^{st} being wise overmuch. The proposed
regulation would enable the Govern^t to exclude particular persons from
office as long as they pleased. He mentioned the case of the Co[~m]ander
in Chief's presenting his account for secret services, which he said was
so moderate that every one was astonished at it; and so simple that no
doubt could arise on it. Yet had the Auditor been disposed to delay the
settlement, how easily he might have effected it, & how cruel w^d it be
in such a case to keep a distinguished & meritorious Citizen under a
temporary disability & disfranchisement. He mentioned this case merely
to illustrate the objectionable nature of the proposition. He was
opposed to such minutious regulations in a Constitution. The
parliamentary qualifications quoted by Col. Mason, had been disregarded
in practice; and was but a scheme of the landed ag^{st} the monied
interest.
M^r Pinckney & Gen^l Pinckney moved to insert by way of amendm^t the
words Judiciary & Executive so as to extend the qualifications to those
departments which was agreed to nem con.
M^r Gerry thought the inconveniency of excluding a few worthy
individuals who might be public debtors or have unsettled acc^{ts} ought
not to be put in the scale ag^{st} the public advantages of the
regulation, and that the motion did not go far enough.
M^r King observed that there might be great danger in requiring landed
property as a qualification since it would exclude the monied interest,
whose aids may be essential in particular emergencies to the public
safety.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account