The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful artsBrewster, David
Science
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts
Brewster, David
Kaleidoscopes
All the various forms which nature and art present to us, may be
divided into two classes, namely, _simple_ or _irregular_ forms, and
_compound_ or _regular_ forms. To the first class belong all those
forms which are called picturesque, and which cannot be reduced to two
forms similar, and similarly situated with regard to a given point; and
to the second class belong the forms of animals, the forms of regular
architectural buildings, the forms of most articles of furniture and
ornament, the forms of many natural productions, and all forms, in
short, which are composed of two forms, similar and similarly situated
with regard to a given line or plane.
Now, it is obvious that all compound forms of this kind are composed
of a direct and an inverted image of a simple or an irregular form;
and, therefore, every simple form can be converted into a compound
or beautiful form, by skilfully combining it with an inverted image
of itself, formed by reflexion. The image, however, must be formed
by reflexion from the first surface of the mirror, in order that the
direct and the reflected image may join, and constitute one united
whole; for if the image is reflected from the posterior surface, as
in the case of a looking-glass, the direct and the inverted image can
never coalesce into one form, but must always be separated by a space
equal to the thickness of the mirror-glass.
If we arrange simple forms in the most perfect manner round a centre,
it is impossible by any art to combine them into a symmetrical and
beautiful picture. The regularity of their arrangement may give some
satisfaction to the eye, but the adjacent forms can never join, and
must therefore form a picture composed of disunited parts.
The case, however, is quite different with compound forms. If we
arrange a succession of similar forms of this class round a centre, it
necessarily follows that they will all combine into one perfect whole,
in which all the parts either are or may be united, and which will
delight the eye by its symmetry and beauty.
In order to illustrate the preceding observations, we have represented
in Figs. 4 and 5 the effects produced by the multiplication of single
and compound forms. The line _a b c d_, for example, Fig. 4, is a
simple form, and is arranged round a centre in the same way as it would
be done by a perfect multiplying glass, if such a thing could be made.
The consecutive forms are all disunited, and do not compose a whole.
Fig. 5 represents the very same simple form, _a b c d_, converted into
a compound form, and then, as it were, multiplied and arranged round a
centre. In this case every part of the figure is united, and forms a
whole, in which there is nothing redundant and nothing deficient; and
this is the precise effect which is produced by the application of the
Kaleidoscope to the simple form _a b c_.
[Illustration: FIG. 4.]
[Illustration: FIG. 5.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account