The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful artsBrewster, David
Science
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts
Brewster, David
Kaleidoscopes
The fundamental principle, therefore, of the Kaleidoscope is, that
it produces symmetrical and beautiful pictures, by converting simple
into compound or beautiful forms, and arranging them, by successive
reflexions, into one perfect whole.
This principle, it will be readily seen, cannot be discovered by any
examination of the luminous sectors which compose the circular field of
the Kaleidoscope, and is not even alluded to in any of the propositions
given by Mr. Harris and Mr. Wood. In looking at the circular field
composed of an even and an odd number of reflexions, the arrangement
of the sectors is perfect in both cases; but when the number is odd,
and the form of the object simple, and when the object is not similarly
placed with regard to the two mirrors, a symmetrical and united picture
cannot possibly be produced. Hence it is manifest, that neither the
principles nor the effects of the Kaleidoscope could possibly be
deduced from any practical knowledge respecting the luminous sectors.
In order to explain the formation of the symmetrical picture shown in
Fig. 5, we must consider that the simple form _m n_, Fig. 2, is seen
by direct vision through the open sector =A O B=, and that the image
_n o_, of the object _m n_, formed by one reflexion in the sector =B
O _a_=, is necessarily an inverted image. But since the image _o p_,
in the sector =_a_ O α=, is a reflected and consequently an inverted
image of the _inverted image_, _m t_, in the sector =A O _b_=, it
follows, that the whole _n o p_ is an inverted image of the whole _n
m t_. Hence the image _n o_ will unite with the image _o p_, in the
same manner as _m n_ unites with _m t_. But as these two last unite
into a regular form, the two first will also unite into a regular or
compound form. Now, since the half =β O _e_= of the last sector =β O α=
was formerly shown to be an image of the half sector =_a_ O _s_=, the
line _q v_ will also be an image of the line _o z_, and for the same
reason the line _v p_ will be an image of _t y_. But the image _v p_
forms the same angle with =B O= or _n q_ that _t y_ does, and is equal
and similar to _t y_; and _q v_ forms the same angle with =A O= that
_o z_ does, and is equal and similar to _o z_. Hence, =O _o_ =
_o q_=, and =O _y_ O _v_=, and therefore _q v_ and _v p_ will form
one straight line, equal and similar to _t q_, and similarly situated
with respect to =B O=. The figure _m n o p q t_, therefore, composed of
one direct object, and several reflected images of that object, will
be symmetrical. As the same reasoning is applicable to every object
extending across the aperture =A O B=, whether simple or compound, and
to every angle =A O B=, which is an even aliquot part of a circle, it
follows,—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account