The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful artsBrewster, David
Science
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts
Brewster, David
Kaleidoscopes
When two mirrors, therefore, are combined, as in Fig. 14, the eye
must be in the plane of both, in order that the object and its image
may have a symmetrical coincidence, and therefore it must be at the
point =E= where the two planes cut each other. The necessity of this
position, and the effects of any considerable deviation from it, will
be understood from Fig. 14, where =A O B= is the angle formed by the
mirrors, and =M N= the place of the object. Then if the eye is placed
at ε, the aperture =A O B= will be projected into =_a b_ ω= upon a
plane passing through =M N= and at right angles to =E Oʹ=; but the
orthographic projection of =A B O= upon the same plane is =Aʹ Bʹ Oʹ=,
or, what is the same thing, the reflecting surfaces of which =A O=, =B
O= are sections, will, when prolonged, cut the plane passing through
=M N= in the lines =Aʹ Oʹ=, =Bʹ Oʹ=; hence, rays from the objects
situated between =Aʹ Oʹ Bʹ= and =_a_ ω _b_= cannot fall upon the
mirrors =A O E=, =B O E=, or images of these objects cannot be formed
by the mirrors. The images, therefore, in the different sectors formed
by reflexion round =O= as a centre, cannot include any objects without
=Aʹ Oʹ Bʹ=; and since the eye at ε sees all the objects between =Aʹ Oʹ
Bʹ= and =_a_ ω _b_=, there can be no symmetry and uniformity in the
picture formed by the combination of such an object with the images
in the sectors. When the eye descends to _e_, the aperture =A O B=
is projected into =_aʹ oʹ bʹ_=, which approaches nearer to =A O B=;
but for the reasons already assigned, the symmetry of the picture is
still imperfect. As the eye descends, the lines =_aʹ oʹ_, _bʹ oʹ_=
approach to =Aʹ Oʹ=, =Bʹ Oʹ=, and when the eye arrives at =E=, a point
in the plane of both the reflecting surfaces, the projection of the
aperture =A O B= will be =Aʹ Oʹ Bʹ=, and the images in all the sectors
will be exactly similar to the object presented to the aperture.
Hence we conclude in general, _that when an object is placed at any
distance before two mirrors inclined at an angle, which is an even
aliquot part of 360°, the symmetry of the picture is perfect, when the
eye, considered as a mathematical point, is placed at_ =E=, and that
_the deviation from symmetry increases as the eye recedes from_ =E=
_towards_ =ε=.
If the object were a mathematical surface, all the parts of which were
in contact with the extremities =A O=, =B O= of the mirrors, then it is
easy to see that the symmetry of the picture will not be affected by
the deviation of the eye from the point =E=, and, in consequence of the
enlargement of the sector, seen by direct vision. The symmetry of the
picture, is, however, affected in another way, by the deviation of the
eye from the point =E=.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account