The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts — John Shaqi
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful artsBrewster, David
Science
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts
Brewster, David
Kaleidoscopes
Hitherto we have alluded only to symmetry of form, but it is manifest
that before the union of two similar forms can give pleasure to the
eye, there must be also a symmetry of light. If the object =M N O P=,
Fig. 15, is white, and its image _m n o p_ black, they cannot possibly
form, by their combination, an agreeable picture. As any considerable
difference in the intensity of the light will destroy the beauty of the
patterns, it becomes a matter of indispensable importance to determine
the position of the eye, which will give the greatest possible
uniformity to the different images of which the picture is composed.
It has been ascertained by the accurate experiments of Bouguer, that
when light is reflected perpendicularly from good plate glass, only 25
rays are reflected out of 1000; that is, the intensity of the light of
any object seen perpendicularly in plate glass, is to the intensity
of the light of its image as 1000 to 25, or as 40 is to 1. When the
angle of incidence is 60°, the number of reflected rays is 112, and the
intensities are nearly as 9 to 1.—When the angle of incidence is 87½°,
the number of reflected rays is 584, and the intensities are nearly
as 17 to 10, so that the luminousness of the object and its image
approach rapidly to an equality. It is therefore clear, that, in order
to have the greatest uniformity of light in the different images which
compose the figure, the eye must be placed as nearly as possible in the
plane of both the mirrors, that is, as near as possible to the angular
point.—But as it is impracticable to have the eye exactly in the plane
of both mirrors, the images formed by one reflexion must always be
less bright than the direct object, even at the part nearly in contact
with the object. The second and third reflexions, etc., where the rays
fall with less obliquity, will be still darker than the first; though
this difference will not be very perceptible when the inclination of
the mirrors is 30° or upwards, and the eye placed in the position
already described.
It is a curious circumstance, that the positions of the eye which are
necessary to effect a complete union of the images—to represent similar
parts of the object and its images—to observe the object and its image
under the same angular magnitude, and to give a maximum intensity of
light to the reflected images—should all unite in the same point. Had
this not been the case, the construction of the Kaleidoscope would have
been impracticable, and hence it will be seen how vain is the attempt
to produce beautiful and symmetrical forms from any combination of
plain mirrors in which this position of the eye is not a radical and
essential principle.
CHAPTER V.
ON THE EFFECTS PRODUCED UPON THE SYMMETRY OF THE
PICTURE BY VARYING THE POSITION OF THE OBJECT.
Having ascertained the proper position of the eye, we shall now proceed
to determine the position of the object.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account