The Kansas University Quarterly, Vol. I, No. 1 (1892) — John Shaqi
The Kansas University Quarterly, Vol. I, No. 1 (1892)Various
History
The Kansas University Quarterly, Vol. I, No. 1 (1892)
Various
Natural history -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
The specific description of this species rests solely upon the
measurements; the other characters given are not only vague, but are
also common to all the known species. The generic description, as it is
seen, is based upon the structure of the coraco-scapula. It will also
be observed that the characters are not drawn from the type specimen,
as that did not include this part of the skeleton, according to the
author’s statement. Of these two characters, the non-ossification
of the coracoid and scapula is a somewhat doubtful one, as the same
character may or may not occur in allied species, as, for example, in
the species of _Rhamphorhyncus_ (_R. Muensteri_ Goldf.) described by
the author himself. So incomplete and unsatisfactory are the characters
thus given that Zittel, in his Handbuch, dismisses the genus with the
brief remark, “noch unbeschrieben.”
Nevertheless, from the peculiar form of the scapula, and from my
recollection of the specimens upon which the genus was based, I
believe I have determined with certainty an excellent specimen in the
Snow Museum of Kansas University as a member of it, and here give a
sufficiently complete description to place the genus on a more secure
foundation.
This specimen was collected by Professor E. E. Slosson, of Wyoming
University, while a member of my party in western Kansas the past
season. It was partly exposed upon a gently sloping surface of firm
yellow chalk on the Smoky Hill river, in the vicinity of Monument
Rocks. Originally, the nearly complete skeleton must have been
preserved, but a number of the bones had been either wholly or
partially washed away, in some cases leaving their imprint in the
chalk. The bones uncovered, and now lying upon the chalk slab nearly
in their natural relations, are a humerus, both radii and ulnae, a
pteroid, the two carpals of one wrist, both wing metacarpals, a first
and a last wing phalanx, both coraco-scapulae, the posterior part of
the lower jaws, ilium, femur, sternum, numerous ribs and vertebrae. The
two coraco-scapulae lie with their scapular ends nearly touching, and
their coracoid ends separated by a space equivalent to the width of the
sternal articulation. The two elements appear to have been imperfectly
united and were probably not co-ossified. The inferior border of the
coracoid, near the humeral articulation, has a greater expansion than
is found in _Pteranodon_; its shaft is more rounded and less rugose,
lacking especially the strong muscular markings upon the external
surface. The articular surface does not appear to differ materially
from that in _Pteranodon_. The scapula is of nearly the same length
as the coracoid, but is much less stout. It is a thin, spatulate
bone, slightly expanded at the distal extremity, where the margin is
rounded, and without the characteristic oblique articular facet. It
has no supra-glenoid expansion or process on the posterior proximal
border, but has its margin nearly straight or gently concave from the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account