The Kansas University Science Bulletin, Vol. I, No. 2, February, 1902 — John Shaqi
The Kansas University Science Bulletin, Vol. I, No. 2, February, 1902Various
Science
The Kansas University Science Bulletin, Vol. I, No. 2, February, 1902
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Platner (’85) saw a true nebenkern. I have already criticized the
use of the word “nebenkern,” as the name for the spindle remains in
the spermatocytes. Platner himself later denied the nuclear origin
of the nebenkern. His results (’86, 2) agree with mine concerning
the uniting, converging, staining and bending of the spindle-fiber
remains and their passing to the tail. Again, Platner (’89, 1)
probably followed the centrosome and attraction sphere, as well
as the nebenkern, in the second part of the paper on _Helix_ and
_Paludina_. In the pancreas the body is a result of secretion, and
is not a nebenkern. In _Pygæra_ Platner’s large mitosome is the real
nebenkern, as shown by its fibrous structure, its surrounding clear
space and destiny. His small mitosome is what I have described as the
acrosome, and he is mistaken as to its final use. The body he called
centrosome in the nucleus is the persisting accessory chromosome.
Such would be my interpretation of his figures.
Henking (’91) has followed the spermatid changes
in _Pyrrhocoris_ quite carefully. He finds that the
fibers between the chromatin masses are separated into
peripheral fibers and central spindle fibers. The first,
a part of the second and the yolk mass, forms the
nebenkern, which passes down over the axial filament.
The rest of the central fibers form the mitosome. This
takes its position at the angle between the nebenkern
and the nucleus. On the surface of the nucleus it passes
to the anterior end, then back to its original position.
A piece now is constricted off and disappears, while the
rest, increasing its affinity for stains, again wanders
to the anterior pole of the nucleus, and becomes the
acrosome.
The large amount of yolk substance is a disturbing element in
_Pyrrhocoris_, but the nebenkern agrees with that of _Gryllus_ in
having the same origin and destiny, as does also the acrosome in fate
and position. Besides, there is much similarity in the stages, as
seen by comparing Henking’s fig. 63 with my fig. 25, and his fig. 85
with my fig. 32.
Wilcox (’95 and ’96) described the spermatid
metamorphosis in _Caloptenus_. The interzonal fibers, a
long, striated body composed very plainly of distinct
fibers, contracts longitudinally, and the corners round
themselves off, and this forms the nebenkern. It loses
its fibrous structure, comes close to the nucleus, and
then grows out into the axial filament. The centrosome
moves half way around the nucleus and lies between the
latter and the nebenkern. Later the centrosome becomes
the middle piece.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account