The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
and he who claims to possess the former without the latter makes an
absurd assertion. Knowledge of the nature of lordship depends on having
right principles of servantship, and is not perfect without them. This
is a very profound and instructive saying. It will be fully explained in
the proper place.
Footnote 88:
“The Seal of Saintship.”
Footnote 89:
“The Book of the Highway.”
Footnote 90:
“Choice Principles.”
Footnote 91:
“The Book of Unification.”
Footnote 92:
“The Book of the Torment of the Tomb.”
43. ABÚ BAKR MUḤAMMAD B. `UMAR AL-WARRÁQ.
He was a great Shaykh and ascetic. He had seen Aḥmad b. Khaḍrúya and
associated with Muḥammad b. `Alí. He is the author of books on rules of
discipline and ethics. The Ṣúfí Shaykhs have called him “The Instructor
of the Saints” (_mu´addib al-awliyá_). He relates the following story:
“Muḥammad b. `Alí handed to me some of his writings with the request
that I should throw them into the Oxus. I had not the heart to do so,
but placed them in my house and came to him and told him that I had
carried out his order. He asked me what I had seen. I replied,
‘Nothing.‘ He said, ‘You have not obeyed me; return and throw them into
the river.’ I returned, doubting the promised sign, and cast them into
the river. The waters parted and a chest appeared, with its lid open. As
soon as the papers fell into it, the lid closed and the waters joined
again and the chest vanished. I went back to him and told him what had
occurred. He answered, ‘Now you have thrown them in.’ I begged him to
explain the mystery. He said: ‘I composed a work on theology and
mysticism which could hardly be comprehended by the intellect. My
brother Khiḍr desired it of me, and God bade the waters bring it to
him.’”
It is related that Abú Bakr Warráq said: “There are three classes of
men—divines (_`ulamá_) and princes (_umará_) and dervishes (_fuqará_).
When the divines are corrupt, piety and religion are vitiated; when the
princes are corrupt, men’s livelihood is spoiled; and when the dervishes
are corrupt, men’s morals are depraved.” Accordingly, the corruption of
the divines consists in covetousness, that of the princes in injustice,
and that of the dervishes in hypocrisy. Princes do not become corrupt
until they turn their backs on divines, and divines do not become
corrupt until they associate with princes, and dervishes do not become
corrupt until they seek ostentation, because the injustice of princes is
due to want of knowledge, and the covetousness of divines is due to want
of piety, and the hypocrisy of dervishes is due to want of trust in God.
44. ABÚ SA`ID AḤMAD B. `ÍSÁ AL-KHARRÁZ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account