The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
It may happen, then, that God’s love holds absolute sway over the heart
of His servant, and that his reason and natural faculties are too weak
to sustain its rapture and intensity, and that he loses all control of
his power to act (_kasb_). This state is called “union”.[131] Herewith
are connected all extraordinary miracles (_i`jáz_) and acts of
miraculous grace (_karámát_). All ordinary actions are “separation”, and
all acts which violate custom are “union”. God bestows these miracles on
His prophets and saints, and refers His actions to them and theirs to
Himself, as He hath said: “_Verily, they who swear fealty unto thee,
swear fealty unto God_” (Kor. xlviii, 10), and again: “_Whosoever obeys
the Apostle has obeyed God_” (Kor. iv, 82). Accordingly, His saints are
united (_mujtami`_) by their inward feelings (_asrár_) and separated
(_muftariq_) by their outward behaviour, so that their love of God is
strengthened by the internal union, and the right fulfilment of their
duty as servants of God is assured by their external separation. A
certain great Shaykh says—
“_I have realized that which is within me, and my tongue hath conversed
with Thee in secret,
And we are united in one respect, but we are separated in another.
Although awe has hidden Thee from the glances of mine eye,
Ecstasy has made Thee near to my inmost parts._”[132]
The state of being inwardly united he calls “union”, and the secret
conversation of the tongue he calls “separation”; then he indicates that
both union and separation are in himself, and attributes the basis
(_qá`ida_) of them to himself. This is very subtle.
Footnote 131:
Here the author illustrates the meaning of “union” and “separation” by
the action of Muḥammad when he threw gravel in the eyes of the
unbelievers at Badr, and by that of David when he slew Goliath. See p.
185 _supra_.
Footnote 132:
The last words are corrupt and unmetrical in all the texts. I have
found the true reading, من الأَحْشآءِ دانى, in a MS. of the _Kitáb
al-Luma`_ by Abú Naṣr al-Sarráj, which has recently come into the
possession of Mr. A. G. Ellis.
SECTION.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account