The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
Of those two reprobate sects which profess to belong to Ṣúfiism and make
the Ṣúfís partners in their error, one follows Abú Ḥulmán of
Damascus.[136] The stories which his adherents relate of him do not
agree with what is written about him in the books of the Shaykhs, for,
while the Ṣúfís regard him as one of themselves, these sectaries impute
to him the doctrines of incarnation (_ḥulúl_) and commixture (_imtizáj_)
and transmigration of spirits (_naskh-i arwáḥ_). I have seen this
statement in the book of Muqaddasí,[137] who attacks him; and the same
notion of him has been formed by theologians, but God knows best what is
the truth. The other sect refer their doctrine to Fáris,[138] who
pretends to have derived it from Ḥusayn b. Manṣúr (al-Ḥalláj), but he is
the only one of Ḥusayn’s followers who holds such tenets. I saw Abú
Ja`far Ṣaydalání[139] with four thousand men, dispersed throughout
`Iráq, who were Ḥallájís; and they all cursed Fáris on account of this
doctrine. Moreover, in the compositions of al-Ḥalláj himself there is
nothing but profound theosophy.
Footnote 136:
See note, p. 131.
Footnote 137:
The _nisba_ Muqaddasí or Maqdisí belongs to a number of Moslem
writers. I do not know which of them is intended here.
Footnote 138:
See _Nafaḥát_, No. 178.
Footnote 139:
This person, whom the author has already mentioned at the beginning of
Chapter XIII, is not identical with the Ṣúfí of the same name who was
a contemporary of Junayd (_Nafaḥát_, No. 197).
I, `Alí b. `Uthmán al-Jullábí, say that I do not know who Fáris and Abú
Hulmán were or what they said, but anyone who holds a doctrine
conflicting with Unification and true theosophy has no part in religion
at all. If religion, which is the root, is not firmly based, Ṣúfiism,
which is the branch and offspring of religion, must with more reason be
unsound, for it is inconceivable that miracles and evidences should be
manifested except to religious persons and Unitarians. All the errors of
these sectaries are in regard to the spirit (_rúḥ_). Now, therefore, I
will explain its nature and principles according to the Sunní canon, and
in the course of my explanation I will notice the erroneous and delusive
opinions of the heretics in order that your faith may be strengthened
thereby.
_Discourse on the Spirit_ (al-rúḥ).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account