The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
The spirit, then, is a subtle body (_jismí laṭíf_), which comes and goes
by the command of God. On the night of the Ascension, when the Apostle
saw in Heaven Adam, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Jesus, and Abraham, it was
their spirits that he saw; and if the spirit were an accident, it would
not stand by itself so as to become visible, for it would need a _locus_
in substances, and substances are gross (_kathíf_). Accordingly, it has
been ascertained that the spirit is subtle and corporeal (_jasím_), and
being corporeal, it is visible, but visible only to the eye of
intelligence (_chashm-i dil_). And spirits may reside in the crops of
birds or may be armies that move to and fro, as the Apostolic Traditions
declare.
Here we are at variance with the heretics, who assert that the spirit is
eternal (_qadím_), and worship it, and regard it as the sole agent and
governor of things, and call it the uncreated spirit of God, and aver
that it passes from one body to another. No popular error has obtained
such wide acceptance as this doctrine, which is held by the Christians,
although they express it in terms that appear to conflict with it, and
by all the Indians, Tibetans, and Chinese, and is supported by the
consensus of opinion among the Shí`ites, Carmathians, and Ismá`ílís
(_Báṭiniyán_), and is embraced by the two false sects abovementioned.
All these sectaries base their belief on certain propositions and bring
forward proofs in defence of their assertion. I ask them this question:
“What do you mean by ‘eternity’ (_qidam_)? Do you mean the pre-existence
of a non-eternal thing, or an eternal thing that never came into being?”
If they mean the pre-existence of a non-eternal thing, then there is no
difference between us in principle, for we too say that the spirit is
non-eternal (_muḥdath_), and that it existed before the body, as the
Apostle said: “God created the spirits two thousand years before the
bodies.” Accordingly, the spirit is one sort of God’s creatures, and He
joins it to another sort of His creatures, and in joining them together
He produces life through His predestination. But the spirit cannot pass
from body to body, because, just as a body cannot have two lives, so a
spirit cannot have two bodies. If these facts were not affirmed in
Apostolic Traditions by an Apostle who speaks the truth, and if the
matter were considered purely from the standpoint of a reasonable
intelligence, then the spirit would be life and nothing else, and it
would be an attribute, not a substance. Now suppose, on the other hand,
they say that the spirit is an eternal thing that never came into being.
In this case, I ask: “Does it stand by itself or by something else?” If
they say, “By itself,” I ask them, “Is God its world (_`álam_) or not?”
If they answer that God is not its world, they affirm the existence of
two eternal beings, which is contrary to reason, for the eternal is
infinite, and the essence of one eternal being would limit the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account